Literature DB >> 6231402

Prevention of myopotential inhibition of unipolar QRS-inhibited demand pacemakers.

H Aida.   

Abstract

Seventy-two unipolar QRS-inhibited demand pacemakers were examined by provoking myopotential interference by exercise. Filter characteristics of 5 kinds of generators were tested by the use of sin wave pulse. Each myosignal of the major pectoral muscle and the abdominal rectus muscle was subjected to Fourier transform for analyses of amplitude and frequencies. Pacemaker inhibition was observed in 42 (58 per cent) of 72 with the highest frequency in the push up test. In this test, the incidence of myopotential inhibition was significantly lower (p less than 0.01) on the pacemaker implantations in the abdominal wall than that in the anterior chest wall. The myosignals of the major pectoral muscle had sufficient frequency and power density for triggering the QRS sensing mechanism but the abdominal muscular signals did not. To avoid myopotential inhibition of unipolar ventricular inhibited demand pacemakers it is most effective to implant multiprogrammable pacemakers subcutaneously in the abdominal wall and to select the optimal sensitivity according to the myopotential inhibition tests.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6231402     DOI: 10.1007/bf02469489

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Jpn J Surg        ISSN: 0047-1909


  18 in total

1.  Myopotential inhibition of a bipolar pacemaker caused by electrode insulation defect.

Authors:  S Amikam; H Peleg; J Lemer; E Riss
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1977-11

2.  Inhibition of bipolar demand pacemaker by diaphragmatic myopotentials.

Authors:  S S Barold; L S Ong; M D Falkoff; R A Heinle
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1977-10       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Interference effect of myopotenitals on function of unipolar demand pacemakers.

Authors:  O J Ohm; H Bruland; O M Pedersen; E Waerness
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1974-01

4.  Inhibition of demand pacemakers by skeletal muscle potentials.

Authors:  D A Winter
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1973-01-29       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Input signals to pacemakers in a hospital environment.

Authors:  B Parker; S Furman; D J Escher
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1969-10-30       Impact factor: 5.691

6.  Pacemaker inhibition by myopotentials detected by Holter monitoring.

Authors:  L J Jacobs; J S Kerzner; M A Diamond; H F Berlin; C L Sprung
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 1.976

7.  Bradycardia dependent ventricular tachycardia facilitated by myopotential inhibition of a VVI pacemaker.

Authors:  Y Iesaka; T Pinakatt; A J Gosselin; J W Lister
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 1.976

8.  Unipolar sensing abnormalities: incidence and clinical significance of skeletal muscle interference and undersensing in 228 patients.

Authors:  S I Secemsky; R G Hauser; P Denes; L M Edwards
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 1.976

9.  [Inhibition of demand pacemakers by muscle potentials].

Authors:  A Wirtzfeld; M Lampadius; E O Ruprecht
Journal:  Dtsch Med Wochenschr       Date:  1972-01-21       Impact factor: 0.628

10.  Myopotential inhibition of unipolar AV sequential (DVI) pacemaker.

Authors:  H J Echeverria; R M Luceri; R J Thurer; A Castellanos
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 1.976

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.