Literature DB >> 6218224

Effect of distraction on reading versus listening.

C M Margolin, B Griebel, G Wolford.   

Abstract

Levy (1977) reported a series of experiments in which a distracting task (counting aloud) interfered more with reading than with listening. The results were interpreted as evidence of the importance of phonological recoding during reading. In a similar experiment we varied the nature of the distracting task, using one task related to speech (counting aloud) and one task not related to speech (manual response to a threshold shock). Both distracting tasks led to similar results, namely, more interference with reading than listening. On the basis of our results and a consideration of related literature, we ascribe the selective interference effect to the relative difficulty of reading over listening rather than to the importance of speech recoding in reading.

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 6218224     DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.8.6.613

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  2 in total

1.  Irrelevant speech eliminates the word length effect.

Authors:  I Neath; A M Surprenant; D C LeCompte
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1998-03

2.  Writing, Reading, and Listening Differentially Overload Working Memory Performance Across the Serial Position Curve.

Authors:  Richard Tindle; Mitchell G Longstaff
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2015-12-31
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.