Literature DB >> 6210835

Acute low back pain. Comparison of two conservative treatment approaches.

J P Farrell, L T Twomey.   

Abstract

In a controlled clinical trial, we allocated 48 subjects with acute low back pain but without neurological signs, at random to two treatment groups. The conservative treatments compared were passive mobilisation and manipulation of the lumbar spine and a regimen of microwave diathermy, isometric abdominal exercises and ergonomic instructions. The duration of low back pain symptoms was significantly shorter for subjects receiving mobilisation and manipulation; they also achieved symptom-free status with fewer treatment sessions. While the duration of symptoms before first treatment, the treatment administered, and the pretest forward flexion movement indices accounted for 44% of the variance in the duration of symptoms, a stepwise multiple regression analysis showed that treatment is the most significant factor in predicting the length of time before a subject achieves symptom-free status.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 6210835

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med J Aust        ISSN: 0025-729X            Impact factor:   7.738


  12 in total

1.  Chiropractic spinal manipulation for back pain.

Authors:  E Ernst
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 13.800

Review 2.  Outcome of non-invasive treatment modalities on back pain: an evidence-based review.

Authors:  Maurits W van Tulder; Bart Koes; Antti Malmivaara
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Physiotherapy exercises and back pain: a blinded review.

Authors:  B W Koes; L M Bouter; H Beckerman; G J van der Heijden; P G Knipschild
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-06-29

4.  Management of low-back pain in family practice: a critical review.

Authors:  J R Gilbert
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 3.275

5.  A randomized study of manual therapy with steroid injections in low-back pain. Telephone interview follow-up of pain, disability, recovery and drug consumption.

Authors:  S Blomberg; K Svärdsudd; G Tibblin
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Spinal manipulation for low-back pain: an office procedure.

Authors:  G R Hollingworth; W E Wood
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 7.  Low back pain.

Authors:  A Frank
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-04-03

8.  Spinal manipulation and mobilisation for back and neck pain: a blinded review.

Authors:  B W Koes; W J Assendelft; G J van der Heijden; L M Bouter; P G Knipschild
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-11-23

Review 9.  Association of Spinal Manipulative Therapy With Clinical Benefit and Harm for Acute Low Back Pain: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Neil M Paige; Isomi M Miake-Lye; Marika Suttorp Booth; Jessica M Beroes; Aram S Mardian; Paul Dougherty; Richard Branson; Baron Tang; Sally C Morton; Paul G Shekelle
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2017-04-11       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  No Difference in Transverse Abdominis Activation Ratio between Healthy and Asymptomatic Low Back Pain Patients during Therapeutic Exercise.

Authors:  Nathaniel Gorbet; Noelle M Selkow; Joseph M Hart; Susan Saliba
Journal:  Rehabil Res Pract       Date:  2010-08-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.