Literature DB >> 620880

The size of the loading dose as an important determinant of the results of the oral glucose tolerance test: a study in subjects with slightly impaired glucose tolerance.

E de Nobel, A van't Laar.   

Abstract

In the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), divergent doses of glucose remain in use by virtue of the prevailing conviction that the size of the loading dose hardly affects the outcome of the test. We compared the results of OGTTs with 100-gm. and 50-gm. loads in 85 patients, who were selected for slightly impaired glucose tolerance (plasma glucose at 120 minutes after 100 gm. of glucose was between 130 and 200 mg./dl.) The mean between-load difference in this group appeared to be nearly three times as great (54 mg./dl. at 120 minutes) as reported in the literature for normal subjects. The small impact of the dose in normal subjects could be confirmed in a group of 22 controls. As subjects with normal and with slightly impaired glucose tolerance react divergently to a change in the glucose dose, tests with different loads are not comparable and select different populations. The results can therefore also not be converted to one another by conversion formulas. The finding might be explained by the delay of the additional rise of the plasma insulin in patients after the higher load.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1978        PMID: 620880     DOI: 10.2337/diab.27.1.42

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes        ISSN: 0012-1797            Impact factor:   9.461


  9 in total

1.  Hyperproinsulinaemia in cirrhosis.

Authors:  R Taylor; K G Alberti
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 10.122

2.  Glucose tolerance in opiate addicts.

Authors:  P P Vescovi; A Pezzarossa; R Caccavari; G Valenti; U Butturini
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  1982-11       Impact factor: 10.122

3.  Sex differences in glucose levels: a consequence of physiology or methodological convenience? The Inter99 study.

Authors:  K Faerch; K Borch-Johnsen; A Vaag; T Jørgensen; D R Witte
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2010-02-25       Impact factor: 10.122

4.  Impaired glucose tolerance in a middle-aged male urban population: a new approach for identifying high-risk cases.

Authors:  K F Eriksson; F Lindgärde
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 10.122

Review 5.  Evidence for current diagnostic criteria of diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Ritesh Kumar; Lakshmana Perumal Nandhini; Sadishkumar Kamalanathan; Jayaprakash Sahoo; Muthupillai Vivekanadan
Journal:  World J Diabetes       Date:  2016-09-15

6.  Glucose or glucose monohydrate for glucose tolerance tests?

Authors:  P Garcia-Webb; A M Bonser
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 10.122

7.  Effects of size, time of day and sequence of meal ingestion on carbohydrate tolerance in normal subjects.

Authors:  F J Service; L D Hall; R E Westland; P C O'Brien; V L Go; M W Haymond; R A Rizza
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 10.122

8.  Impact of glucose dosing regimens on modeling of glucose tolerance and β-cell function by intravenous glucose tolerance test in diet-induced obese mice.

Authors:  Bilal A Omar; Giovanni Pacini; Bo Ahrén
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2014-05-19

Review 9.  The Oral Glucose Tolerance Test: 100 Years Later.

Authors:  Ram Jagannathan; João Sérgio Neves; Brenda Dorcely; Stephanie T Chung; Kosuke Tamura; Mary Rhee; Michael Bergman
Journal:  Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 3.168

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.