| Literature DB >> 27660696 |
Ritesh Kumar1, Lakshmana Perumal Nandhini1, Sadishkumar Kamalanathan1, Jayaprakash Sahoo1, Muthupillai Vivekanadan1.
Abstract
Diabetes mellitus is a non-communicable metabolic derangement afflicting several millions of individuals globally. It is associated with several micro and macrovascular complications and is also a leading cause of mortality. The unresolved issue is that of definition of the diagnostic threshold for diabetes. The World Health Organization and the American Diabetes Association (ADA) have laid down several diagnostic criteria for diagnosing diabetes and prediabetes based on the accumulating body of evidence.This review has attempted to analyse the scientific evidence supporting the justification of these differing criteria. The evidence for diagnosing diabetes is strong, and there is a concordance between the two professional bodies. The controversy arises when describing the normal lower limit of fasting plasma glucose (FPG) with little evidence favouring the reduction of the FPG by the ADA. Several studies have also shown the development of complications specific for diabetes in patients with prediabetes as defined by the current criteria though there is a significant overlap of such prevalence in individuals with normoglycemia. Large multinational longitudinal prospective studies involving subjects without diabetes and retinopathy at baseline will ideally help identify the threshold of glycemic measurements for future development of diabetes and its complications.Entities:
Keywords: Diabetes; Macrovascular complications; Microvascular complications; Post glucose; Prediabetes
Year: 2016 PMID: 27660696 PMCID: PMC5027003 DOI: 10.4239/wjd.v7.i17.396
Source DB: PubMed Journal: World J Diabetes ISSN: 1948-9358