Literature DB >> 6207004

Stationary peaks from a moving source in far-field recording.

J Kimura, A Mitsudome, T Yamada, Q S Dickins.   

Abstract

In 20 radial nerves, referential recording of antidromic sensory potentials from the digits consisted of two stationary far-field peaks, PI-NI and PII-NII. When compared with a bipolar recording of a moving source, the onset of PI and PII was coincident with the sensory potential approaching the wrist and the base of the digit, respectively. Of the two stationary positive peaks, PI was identical in latency irrespective of the digits tested. In contrast, the latency of PII was smaller for the first digit than the others, reflecting different distances from the stimulus point to the base of the respective digit. The amplitude of PII was proportional to that of the propagating sensory nerve action potential recorded at the volume conductor junction. A bipolar recording registers a near-field potential over the sensory fibers along the length of the nerve. In contrast, a referential recording represents a mixture of the near- and far-field potentials with the latter frequently producing major alterations of the classical triphasic wave. The standing far-field peaks show a temporal relationship to the traveling volleys approaching the main borders of the volume conductor. At the moment the sensory impulse reaches the boundary, current density changes suddenly in the two adjacent conducting media, giving rise to an apparent standing potential. The same mechanism probably plays an important role for the generation of some of the short latency peaks in the scalp recorded SEPs.

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6207004     DOI: 10.1016/0013-4694(84)90061-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0013-4694


  7 in total

1.  Monopolar surface electromyography: a better tool to assess motoneuron excitability upon passive muscle stretching.

Authors:  Hikmat Hadoush; Yoshiko Tobimatsu; Akiyoshi Nagatomi; Hiroaki Kimura; Yoshihiro Ito; Hiroshi Maejima
Journal:  J Physiol Sci       Date:  2009-03-03       Impact factor: 2.781

2.  The propagation potential. An axonal response with implications for scalp-recorded EEG.

Authors:  A P Rudell; S E Fox
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Subcortical P30 potential following tibial nerve stimulation: detection and normative data.

Authors:  M Tinazzi; G Zanette; A Polo; C Bonato; P Manganotti; A Fiaschi; F Mauguière
Journal:  Ital J Neurol Sci       Date:  1995-12

4.  The optimal recording electrode configuration for compound sensory action potentials.

Authors:  E Eduardo; D Burke
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 10.154

5.  ASNM position statement: intraoperative monitoring of auditory evoked potentials.

Authors:  William Hal Martin; Mark M Stecker
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.977

Review 6.  Local Field Potentials: Myths and Misunderstandings.

Authors:  Oscar Herreras
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2016-12-15       Impact factor: 3.492

7.  Taking the EEG Back Into the Brain: The Power of Multiple Discrete Sources.

Authors:  Michael Scherg; Patrick Berg; Nobukazu Nakasato; Sándor Beniczky
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2019-08-20       Impact factor: 4.003

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.