Literature DB >> 2841424

The optimal recording electrode configuration for compound sensory action potentials.

E Eduardo1, D Burke.   

Abstract

There is no uniformity in the published literature from different laboratories on the optimal electrode configuration for recording nerve action potentials, and a number of standard texts omit any reference to the effects that interelectrode distance and electrode orientation can have on the shape, amplitude and latency of nerve action potentials. The sensory action potential from the digital nerves of the index finger was recorded at wrist and elbow using bipolar electrodes with the "active" electrode over the median nerve and the "reference" placed 4 cm laterally or proximally along the nerve using interelectrode distances of 4, 3 and 2 cm. These potentials were compared with that recorded using a remote reference on the ipsilateral shoulder, the assumption being that this configuration eliminated the contribution of the reference electrode to the compound nerve action potential. With different electrode configurations, there were significant differences in the shape of the potential, the latencies to onset and peak and the rising- and falling-phase amplitudes. The shorter the distance between the electrodes the greater the distortions. Overall, the distortions were least with the 4 cm interelectrode separation, particularly for short conduction distances.

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 2841424      PMCID: PMC1033077          DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.51.5.684

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry        ISSN: 0022-3050            Impact factor:   10.154


  14 in total

1.  Surface recording of orthodromic sensory nerve action potentials in median and ulnar nerves in normal subjects.

Authors:  K Andersen
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 3.217

2.  Stationary waves recorded at the shoulder after median nerve stimulation.

Authors:  R W Frith; T J Benstead; J R Daube
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 9.910

3.  Far-field recording of the junctional potential generated by median nerve volleys at the wrist.

Authors:  J Kimura; T Ishida; S Suzuki; Y Kudo; H Matsuoka; T Yamada
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 9.910

4.  Relation between size of compound sensory or muscle action potentials, and length of nerve segment.

Authors:  J Kimura; M Machida; T Ishida; T Yamada; R L Rodnitzky; Y Kudo; S Suzuki
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 9.910

5.  Alcoholic neuropathy. An electrophysiological and histological study.

Authors:  J C Walsh; J G McLeod
Journal:  J Neurol Sci       Date:  1970-05       Impact factor: 3.181

6.  Stationary peaks from a moving source in far-field recording.

Authors:  J Kimura; A Mitsudome; T Yamada; Q S Dickins
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1984-10

7.  Sensory nerve action potentials of the medial and lateral plantar nerve.

Authors:  K S Iyer; E Kaplan; J Goodgold
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 3.966

8.  Orthodromic vs antidromic sensory nerve latencies in healthy persons.

Authors:  G Chodoroff; E A Tashjian; M R Ellenberg
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 3.966

9.  A system for review of findings on muscle biopsy--a teaching aid.

Authors:  R C Grotz; C Long
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1966-02       Impact factor: 3.966

10.  Superficial peroneal nerve conduction studies for electromyographic diagnosis.

Authors:  K H Levin; J C Stevens; J R Daube
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 3.217

View more
  4 in total

1.  Accommodation to hyperpolarization of human axons assessed in the frequency domain.

Authors:  James Howells; Hugh Bostock; David Burke
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Measuring conduction velocity distributions in peripheral nerves using neurophysiological techniques.

Authors:  Zhen Ni; Felipe Vial; Alexandru V Avram; Giorgio Leodori; Sinisa Pajevic; Peter J Basser; Mark Hallett
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 3.708

3.  Pitfalls in using electrophysiological studies to diagnose neuromuscular disorders.

Authors:  Yong Seo Koo; Charles S Cho; Byung-Jo Kim
Journal:  J Clin Neurol       Date:  2012-03-31       Impact factor: 3.077

Review 4.  Antidromic vs orthodromic sensory median nerve conduction studies.

Authors:  Josep Valls-Sole; Joao Leote; Pedro Pereira
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol Pract       Date:  2016-04-07
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.