Literature DB >> 6205868

A developmental study on the effect of stimulus rate on the auditory evoked brain-stem response.

R E Lasky.   

Abstract

Four groups of subjects were presented auditory stimuli differing only in repetition rate. One group was adults, another term newborns, and the other 2 groups were preterm newborns tested at respectively, 32 and 36 weeks postconceptional age. All 4 groups were judged to be audiologically and neurologically normal at the time of testing. Six stimulus repetition rates were presented to each subject, 10, 20, 40, 50, 66 2/3, and 80/sec. Auditory evoked brain-stem responses (ABRs) were recorded to each stimulus. Increasing repetition rate increased ABR wave form latencies and decreased ABR wave form amplitudes at all ages tested. For the most reliable measurement, wave V latency, a linear function effectively described the latency-rate function for individual subjects at all ages. The slope of the wave V latency-rate function increased with decreasing age. It was 300 microseconds decade change in rate at 32 weeks, 227 microseconds/decade at 36 weeks, 162 microseconds/decade at term, and 86 microseconds/decade in adults. Wave V latencies were more prolonged by rate than waves I and III and the differences in the rate effects between waves V and I and III increased with decreasing age. Amplitude was a less reliable measurement and amplitude-rate effects were less consistent than latency-rate effects.

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6205868     DOI: 10.1016/0168-5597(84)90042-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0013-4694


  9 in total

1.  The effects of aggressive vs. conservative phototherapy on the brainstem auditory evoked responses of extremely-low-birth-weight infants.

Authors:  Robert E Lasky; Michael W Church; Mark S Orlando; Brenda H Morris; Nehal A Parikh; Jon E Tyson; Georgia E McDavid; William Oh; David K Stevenson; Krisa P Van Meurs; Ronnie Guillet; Dale L Phelps
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 3.756

2.  The effects of preceding lead-alone and lag-alone click trains on the buildup of echo suppression.

Authors:  Christopher W Bishop; Deepak Yadav; Sam London; Lee M Miller
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Repeated courses of antenatal corticosteroids: are there effects on the infant's auditory brainstem responses?

Authors:  Michael W Church; Ronald J Wapner; Lisa M Mele; Francee Johnson; Donald J Dudley; Catherine Y Spong; Alan M Peaceman; Atef H Moawad; Mary J O'Sullivan; Menachem Miodovnik
Journal:  Neurotoxicol Teratol       Date:  2010-05-27       Impact factor: 3.763

4.  Associations between prenatal and recent postnatal methylmercury exposure and auditory function at age 19 years in the Seychelles Child Development Study.

Authors:  Mark S Orlando; Adam C Dziorny; Donald Harrington; Tanzy Love; Conrad F Shamlaye; Gene E Watson; Edwin van Wijngaarden; Philip W Davidson; Gary J Myers
Journal:  Neurotoxicol Teratol       Date:  2014 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.763

5.  Optimizing Parameters for Using the Parallel Auditory Brainstem Response to Quickly Estimate Hearing Thresholds.

Authors:  Melissa J Polonenko; Ross K Maddox
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2022 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.562

6.  Cycled Phototherapy Dose-Finding Study for Extremely Low-Birth-Weight Infants: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Cody Arnold; Jon E Tyson; Claudia Pedroza; Wally A Carlo; David K Stevenson; Ronald Wong; Allison Dempsey; Amir Khan; Rafael Fonseca; Myra Wyckoff; Alvaro Moreira; Robert Lasky
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 16.193

7.  Temporal processing in the auditory brainstem response by full-term 6-week- and 9-month-old infants.

Authors:  Xiaoqin Mai; Twila Tardif; Lin Xu; Mingyan Li; Paul R Kileny; Jie Shao; Betsy Lozoff
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Outer Hair Cell and Auditory Nerve Function in Speech Recognition in Quiet and in Background Noise.

Authors:  Richard Hoben; Gifty Easow; Sofia Pevzner; Mark A Parker
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 4.677

9.  The Effects of Random Stimulation Rate on Measurements of Auditory Brainstem Response.

Authors:  Xin Wang; Mingxing Zhu; Oluwarotimi Williams Samuel; Xiaochen Wang; Haoshi Zhang; Junjie Yao; Yun Lu; Mingjiang Wang; Subhas Chandra Mukhopadhyay; Wanqing Wu; Shixiong Chen; Guanglin Li
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 3.169

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.