Literature DB >> 6204821

Effect of 5-bromodeoxyuridine substitution on sister chromatid exchange induction by chemicals.

W F Morgan, S Wolff.   

Abstract

The fluorescence-plus-Giemsa (FPG) technique for analysis of sister chromatid exchange (SCE) is widely used as an assay for mutagenic carcinogens. There is very little information, however, on whether incorporation of the bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) necessary for visualization of SCEs affects the sensitivity of the SCE test system to different chemical agents. We have investigated the effect of BrdU incorporation on SCE induction by labeling cells with BrdU for either the first cell cycle or the first and second cell cycles. The cells were then treated with bleomycin, which produces DNA strand breakage; proflavine, which intercalates into DNA; mitomycin C, which produces monoadducts and DNA crosslinks; or aphidicolin, which inhibits DNA polymerase alpha. Chemicals were added before BrdU exposure or during the first, second, or both cell cycles. Only mitomycin C, which induces long-lived lesions, elevated the SCE frequency when cells were treated before BrdU labeling. When bleomycin, proflavine, or mitomycin C was present concurrently with BrdU, the frequency of SCEs was increased independently of the BrdU labeling protocol. Aphidicolin, on the other hand, induced more SCEs when present for the second cell cycle, when DNA replicates on a template DNA strand containing BrdU. We also examined the induction of SCEs in the first cell cycle (twins) and in the second cell cycle (singles) after continuous treatment of cells with BrdU and the test chemicals. Only aphidicolin increased SCE frequency in the second cell cycle. These results indicate that aphidicolin, but not bleomycin, proflavine, or mitomycin C, affects BrdU-substituted DNA and unsubstituted DNA differently. This type of interaction should be taken into consideration when the SCE test is used as an assay system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6204821     DOI: 10.1007/bf00292476

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chromosoma        ISSN: 0009-5915            Impact factor:   4.316


  32 in total

1.  Sister chromatid exchanges induced by light flashes to 5-bromodeoxyuridine- and 5-iododeoxyuridine substituted Chinese hamster chromosomes.

Authors:  T Ikushima; S Wolff
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 3.905

2.  Microfluorometric detection of deoxyribonucleic acid replication in human metaphase chromosomes.

Authors:  S A Latt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1973-12       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Sister chromatid exchanges induced in Chinese hamster cells by UV irradiation of different stages of the cell cycle: the necessity for cells to pass through S.

Authors:  S Wolff; J Bodycote; R B Painter
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1974-10       Impact factor: 2.433

4.  Influence of false twins on the ratios of twin and single sister chromatid exchanges.

Authors:  J A Heddle
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1969-01       Impact factor: 2.691

5.  Increase in radiosensitivity to ionizing radiation related to replacement of thymidine in mammalian cells with 5-bromodeoxyuridine.

Authors:  W C Dewey; R M Humphrey
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1965-12       Impact factor: 2.841

6.  Induction of sister chromatid exchange by 3-aminobenzamide is independent of bromodeoxyuridine.

Authors:  W F Morgan; S Wolff
Journal:  Cytogenet Cell Genet       Date:  1984

7.  Reduced N-methyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine sister chromatid exchange induction in Chinese hamster V79 cells pre-exposed to 5-bromodeoxyuridine.

Authors:  N C Popescu; S A Amsbaugh; J A DiPaolo
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 4.316

8.  Factors influencing the frequency of mitomycin C-induced sister-chromatid exchanges in 5-bromodeoxyuridine-substituted human lymphocytes in culture.

Authors:  Y Ishii; M A Bender
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1978-09       Impact factor: 2.433

9.  The interaction of Hoechst 33258 and BrdU substituted DNA in the formation of sister chromatid exchanges.

Authors:  D G Stetka; A V Carrano
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1977-08-18       Impact factor: 4.316

10.  SCE evaluations in human lymphocytes after G0 exposure to mitomycin C. Lack of expression of MMC-induced SCEs in cells that have undergone greater than two in vitro divisions.

Authors:  L G Littlefield; S P Colyer; R J DuFrain
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 2.433

View more
  4 in total

1.  X-irradiation of G1 CHO cells induces SCE which are both true and false in BrdU-substituted cells but only false in biotin-dUTP-substituted cells.

Authors:  E Bruckmann; A Wojcik; G Obe
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 5.239

2.  Effect of bromodeoxyuridine on the proliferation and growth of ethyl methanesulfonate-exposed P3 cells: relationship to the induction of sister-chromatid exchanges.

Authors:  S M Morris; O E Domon; L J McGarrity; R L Kodell; D A Casciano
Journal:  Cell Biol Toxicol       Date:  1992 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 6.691

3.  High frequency of mutagen-induced chromatid exchanges at interstitial telomere-like DNA sequence blocks of Chinese hamster cells.

Authors:  J L Fernández; J Gosálvez; V Goyanes
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 5.239

4.  Strand breaks arising from the repair of the 5-bromodeoxyuridine-substituted template and methyl methanesulphonate-induced lesions can explain the formation of sister chromatid exchanges.

Authors:  R Saffhill; C H Ockey
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 4.316

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.