Literature DB >> 6181946

The structure and position of mouse centromeric heterochromatin in BrdU-labelled chromosomes and diplochromosomes stained by the pH 10.4 method.

P R Alves.   

Abstract

A mouse cell line of C57Bl/6J spontaneous melanoma (clone PG 19), and a C-type virus transformed cell line (G-8 clone 124) originating from normal Balb/c mice were used in a study of the centromeric heterochromatin region of BrdU-labelled chromosomes stained by the Giemsa pH 10.4 method. Three possible explanations for the generation of compound lateral asymmetry within the centromeric heterochromatin region of the laboratory mouse are discussed: 1) inverted translocation; 2) centric fusion followed by paracentromeric fission and 3) inversion of part of the centromeric satellite DNA. These processes could be of considerable genetic and evolutionary significance. The non-random spatial position of unstained and dark stained C-bands in BrdU-labelled diplochromosomes of endoreduplicated cells can be explained as being due to the localization of the old and new DNA chains in a unineme chromatid model. The late replicating regions are shown to be located on the inside of the half-chromatid close to the axial symmetry axis of the metaphase chromosome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1982        PMID: 6181946     DOI: 10.1007/bf00330783

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chromosoma        ISSN: 0009-5915            Impact factor:   4.316


  19 in total

1.  SPATIAL RELATIONSHIPS IN THE REPLICATION OF CHROMOSOMAL DNA.

Authors:  K H WALEN
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1965-06       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Centric fusion, satellite DNA, and DNA polarity in mouse chromosomes.

Authors:  M S Lin; R L Davidson
Journal:  Science       Date:  1974-09-27       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Microfluorometric detection of asymmetry in the centromeric region of mouse chromosomes.

Authors:  M S Lin; S A Latt; R L Davidson
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  1974-06       Impact factor: 3.905

4.  On the mechanism of DNA replication in mammalian chromosomes.

Authors:  J A Huberman; A D Riggs
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1968-03-14       Impact factor: 5.469

5.  The isolation of complementary strands from a mouse DNA fraction.

Authors:  W G Flamm; M McCallum; P M Walker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1967-06       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Reciprocal Giemsa staining of late DNA replicating regions produced by low and high pH sodium phosphate.

Authors:  G D Burkholder
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  1978-02       Impact factor: 3.905

7.  Infection of an established mouse bone marrow cell line (JLS-V9) with Rauscher and Moloney murine leukemia viruses.

Authors:  B S Wright; P A O'Brien; G P Shibley; S A Mayyasi; J C Lasfargues
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1967-09       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  Position of labelled chromatids in diplochromosomes of endo-reduplicated cells after uptake of tritiated thymidine.

Authors:  H G Schwarzacher; W Schnedl
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1966-01-01       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Chromosome markers in Mus musculus: differences in C-banding between the subspecies M.m. musculus and M.m. molossinus.

Authors:  V G Dev; D A Miller; R Tantravahi; R R Schreck; T H Roderick; B F Erlanger; O J Miller
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1975-12-29       Impact factor: 4.316

10.  Lateral asymmetry in human constitutive heterochromatin.

Authors:  R R Angell; P A Jacobs
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1975-08-11       Impact factor: 4.316

View more
  1 in total

1.  Scanning electron microscopy of the centromeric region of L-cell chromosomes after treatment with Hoechst 33258 combined with 5-bromodeoxyuridine.

Authors:  S Takayama; H Hiramatsu
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 4.316

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.