Literature DB >> 1212900

Chromosome markers in Mus musculus: differences in C-banding between the subspecies M.m. musculus and M.m. molossinus.

V G Dev, D A Miller, R Tantravahi, R R Schreck, T H Roderick, B F Erlanger, O J Miller.   

Abstract

Quinacrine (Q-band) and centromeric heterochromatin (C-band) patterns of metaphase chromosomes of two subspecies of Mus musculus were compared. M.m. musculus (the laboratory mouse) and M.m. molossinus (a subspecies from Southeast Asia) had similar Q-band patterns along the length of the chromosomes, but differences were observed in the centromeric region of some chromosomes. The two subspecies had very different distributions of C-band material. Antibodies to 5-methyleytosine were bound to regions of the chromosome corresponding to the C-bands in each animal. These findings support the idea that satellite DNA, which is concentrated in the C-band region, changes more quickly than bulk DNA. The interfertility of these two subspecies permits the development of a musculus strain carrying normal marker chromosomes for genetic studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1975        PMID: 1212900     DOI: 10.1007/bf00294081

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chromosoma        ISSN: 0009-5915            Impact factor:   4.316


  14 in total

1.  5-Methylcytosine localised in mammalian constitutive heterochromatin.

Authors:  O J Miller; W Schnedl; J Allen; B F Erlanger
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1974-10-18       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Clonal variants of constitutive heterochromatin of human fibroblasts after recovery from mitomycin treatment.

Authors:  H Hoehn; G M Martin
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1973-08-10       Impact factor: 4.316

3.  Repeated sequences in DNA. Hundreds of thousands of copies of DNA sequences have been incorporated into the genomes of higher organisms.

Authors:  R J Britten; D E Kohne
Journal:  Science       Date:  1968-08-09       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Mouse nuclear satellite DNA: 5-methylcytosine content, pyrimidine isoplith distribution and electron microscopic appearance.

Authors:  R Salomon; A M Kaye; M Herzberg
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1969-08-14       Impact factor: 5.469

5.  Chromosomal localization of mouse satellite DNA.

Authors:  M L Pardue; J G Gall
Journal:  Science       Date:  1970-06-12       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Chromosome markers in Mus musculus: strain differences in C-banding.

Authors:  V G Dev; D A Miller; O J Miller
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1973-12       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Relatedness of mouse satellite deoxyribonucleic acid to deoxyribonucleic acid of various Mus species.

Authors:  N R Rice; N A Straus
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1973-12       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Identification of the mouse karyotype by quinacrine fluorescence, and tentative assignment of seven linkage groups.

Authors:  O J Miller; D A Miller; R E Kouri; P W Allderdice; V G Dev; M S Grewal; J J Hutton
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1971-07       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Standard karyotype of the mouse, Mus musculus.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  1972 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.645

10.  Chromosome mapping in the mouse, fluorescence banding techniques permit assignment of most genetic linkage groups.

Authors:  D A Miller; O J Miller
Journal:  Science       Date:  1972-12-01       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  10 in total

1.  Q- and C-band chromosome markers in inbred strains of Mus musculus.

Authors:  D A Miller; R Tantravahi; V G Dev; O J Miller
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1976-09       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Supernumerary chromosome variation and heterochromatin distribution in the endemic New Zealand frog Leiopelma hochstetteri.

Authors:  D M Green; J Kezer; R A Nussbaum
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 4.316

3.  Cytogenetic and biochemical comparison of Mus musculus and Mus hortulanus.

Authors:  L V Yakimenko; K V Korobitsyna; L V Frisman; A I Muntianu
Journal:  Experientia       Date:  1990-10-15

4.  Chromosomal variation in pocket gophers (Geomys) detected by sequential G-, R-, and C-band analyses.

Authors:  M J Smolen; J W Bickham
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 5.239

Review 5.  Structural characteristics of genome organization in amphibians: differential staining of chromosomes and DNA structure.

Authors:  V J Birstein
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 2.395

6.  Cytogenetic studies of the Australian rodent, Uromys caudimaculatus, a species showing extensive heterochromatin variation.

Authors:  P R Baverstock; M Gelder; A Jahnke
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 4.316

Review 7.  Heterochromatin and satellite DNA in man: properties and prospects.

Authors:  G L Miklos; B John
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 11.025

8.  Cytological studies of heterochromatin function in the Drosophila melanogaster male: autosomal meiotic paring.

Authors:  M Yamamoto
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1979-05-10       Impact factor: 4.316

9.  The structure and position of mouse centromeric heterochromatin in BrdU-labelled chromosomes and diplochromosomes stained by the pH 10.4 method.

Authors:  P R Alves
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 4.316

10.  Nucleolus organizers in Mus musculus subspecies and in the RAG mouse cell line.

Authors:  V G Dev; R Tantravahi; D A Miller; O J Miller
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1977-06       Impact factor: 4.562

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.