Literature DB >> 6172174

Comparative results of surgical management of single carcinomas of the colon and rectum: a series of 1939 patients managed by one surgeon.

F T McDermott, E S Hughes, E Pihl, B J Milne, A B Price.   

Abstract

A comparative analysis has been made of the results of surgical management of single carcinomas of the colon and rectum in a series of 1939 patients treated by one surgeon. The data were prospectively collected, with 99 per cent follow-up. Cancer specific survival did not differ significantly between patients with colonic or rectal cancer. Survival prospects were better for women (P = 0.02) and for patients less than 40 years of age (P = 0.03). Survival was significantly related to tumour staging (P less than 0.002). Cancer specific survival was better after curative resection for colonic than rectal carcinoma (P = 0.003). Five-year survival for patients with colonic tumours was 76 per cent and for rectal tumours 69 per cent. The 10-year survival figures were 73 per cent and 51 per cent respectively. This difference was accounted for by a higher proportion of Dukes' stage C tumours in the rectum (P less than 0.001) and better survival prospects for colonic compared to rectal stage C1 tumours (P = 0.02). Sphincter-saving resections were performed in 64 per cent of rectal cancer patients managed by curative resection. Survival tended to be better than after sphincter-sacrificing operations. After palliative resection, median survival for colonic and rectal cancer was 14 and 13 months respectively. After palliative bypass operations the corresponding figures were 4 and 8 months.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1981        PMID: 6172174     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800681207

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  11 in total

1.  Rigid sigmoidoscopy: a potential hazard for cross-contamination.

Authors:  D Z Lubowski; G L Newstead
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-01-17       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  [Spontaneous change of malignancy of solid malignant tumors : statistical investigations of colorectal and pancreatic carcinoma].

Authors:  F Stelzner
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 0.955

3.  Carcinoma of the colon: long-term survival and prognosis after surgical treatment in a series of 798 patients.

Authors:  J Moreaux; M Catala
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Access to care and satisfaction in colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Geoffrey A Porter; Karen M Inglis; Lori A Wood; Paul J Veugelers
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Elective and emergency surgery for colorectal cancer in a district general hospital: impact of surgical training on patient survival.

Authors:  J Chester; D Britton
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 1.891

6.  Risk factors and operative mortality in surgery for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  S C Brown; J S Abraham; S Walsh; P A Sykes
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 1.891

7.  The influence of age upon the survival after curative operation for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  L B Svendsen; C Sørensen; P Kjersgaard; S Meisner; J Kjaergaard
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Skeletal muscle wasting and long-term prognosis in patients undergoing rectal cancer surgery without neoadjuvant therapy.

Authors:  Alessandro Giani; Simone Famularo; Alessandro Fogliati; Luca Riva; Nicolò Tamini; Davide Ippolito; Luca Nespoli; Marco Braga; Luca Gianotti
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 2.754

Review 9.  Relation between skeletal muscle volume and prognosis in rectal cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy.

Authors:  Paola De Nardi; Alessandro Giani; Giulia Maggi; Marco Braga
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2022-02-15

10.  Differences in survival between colon and rectal cancer from SEER data.

Authors:  Yen-Chien Lee; Yen-Lin Lee; Jen-Pin Chuang; Jenq-Chang Lee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.