Literature DB >> 16418794

Rigid sigmoidoscopy: a potential hazard for cross-contamination.

D Z Lubowski1, G L Newstead.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Rigid sigmoidoscopy using a disposable or nondisposable sigmoidoscope is a common outpatient procedure. It has been assumed that the nondisposable bellows and light head of the sigmoidoscope remain free from enteric organisms so that the procedure is sterile if a disposable or nondisposable (metal) sigmoidoscope shaft is used. The aim of this study was to identify the presence of organisms within the bellows or light head of the sigmoidoscope.
METHODS: Of 21 patients undergoing rigid sigmoidoscopy with a disposable instrument, bacterial cultures were taken from the inside of sterile Jackson-Pratt bulbs in 12 patients, with the bulbs being used to simulate the nondisposable insufflation bellows. In an additional nine patients, swabs were taken for culture from the inside of the nondisposable light head.
RESULTS: Enteric gram-negative Escherichia coli and mixed anaerobic organisms were cultured from the Jackson-Pratt bulbs in two cases, and gram-positive organisms were cultured in another case. Gram-negative organisms, including Bacillus, Proteus mirabilis, Klebsiella, and Enterococcus faecalis, were cultured from the inside of the light head in two cases.
CONCLUSION: Sigmoidoscopy using a disposable instrument is not a sterile procedure and may pose a risk of patient-to-patient cross-contamination by potentially harboring organisms in the bellows or light head.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16418794     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-005-0580-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  9 in total

1.  ON CANCER AND POLYPS OF COLON AND RECTUM.

Authors:  G EKELUND
Journal:  Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand       Date:  1963

2.  Proceedings: Changing patterns of colorectal carcinoma.

Authors:  B Cady; A V Persson; D O Monson; D L Maunz
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1974-02       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Comparative results of surgical management of single carcinomas of the colon and rectum: a series of 1939 patients managed by one surgeon.

Authors:  F T McDermott; E S Hughes; E Pihl; B J Milne; A B Price
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  Changing relative frequency of cancers of the colon and rectum in the United States.

Authors:  L M Axtell; L Chiazze
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1966-06       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Colonic adenomas--a colonoscopy survey.

Authors:  P E Gillespie; T J Chambers; K W Chan; F Doronzo; B C Morson; C B Williams
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 23.059

6.  Changing site distribution patterns of colorectal cancer at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital.

Authors:  F E Rosato; G Marks
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1981 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.585

7.  The distribution of colorectal carcinoma and the relationship of tumour site to the survival of patients following resection.

Authors:  P H Chapuis; R C Newland; J G Macpherson; O Dent; J E Payne; M T Pheils
Journal:  Aust N Z J Surg       Date:  1981-04

8.  Diagnostic implications of the spatial distribution of colonic mass lesions (polyps and cancers). A prospective colonoscopic study.

Authors:  F J Tedesco; J D Waye; J R Avella; M M Villalobos
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1980-08       Impact factor: 9.427

9.  Morphology, anatomic distribution and cancer potential of colonic polyps.

Authors:  H Shinya; W I Wolff
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1979-12       Impact factor: 12.969

  9 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  Klebsiella spp. in endoscopy-associated infections: we may only be seeing the tip of the iceberg.

Authors:  P Gastmeier; R-P Vonberg
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 3.553

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.