Literature DB >> 6163942

Isolating the effects of symbolic distance and semantic congruity in comparative judgments: an additive-factors analysis.

E M Duncan, C E McFarland.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  1980        PMID： 6163942     DOI： 10.3758/bf03213781

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN： 0090-502X


× No keyword cloud information.
  12 in total

Review 1.  The development of memory: knowing, knowing about knowing, and knowing how to know.

Authors:  A L Brown
Journal:  Adv Child Dev Behav       Date:  1975

2.  Semantic congruity and lexical marking in symbolic comparisons: an expectancy hypothesis.

Authors:  M Marschark; A Paivio
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1979-05

3.  Complex visual discriminations in cultural familial retardates and normal children.

Authors:  W P Silverman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1974-09

4.  Comparisons of digits and dot patterns.

Authors:  P B Buckley; C B Gillman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1974-12

5.  High speed memory scanning in mental retardates: evidence for a central processing deficit.

Authors:  G J Harris; R E Fleer
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  1974-06

6.  Temporal aspects of digit and letter inequality judgments.

Authors:  J M Parkman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1971-12

Review 7.  Nature of the effect of set on perception.

Authors:  R N Haber
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1966-07       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  Semantic association effects in a mental comparison task.

Authors:  K J Holyoak; S T Dumais; R S Moyer
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1979-07

9.  The manipulation of stimulus quality and the definition of stimulus encoding operations in memory scanning experiments.

Authors:  M Hardzinski; R G Pachella
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1980-03

10.  Time required for judgements of numerical inequality.

Authors:  R S Moyer; T K Landauer
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1967-09-30       Impact factor: 49.962
View more
  32 in total

1.  The locus and nature of semantic congruity in symbolic comparison: evidence from the Stroop effect.

Authors:  Samuel Shaki; Daniel Algom
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-01

2.  Differences between digit naming and number word reading in a flanker task.

Authors:  Anja Ischebeck
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-06

3.  One, two, three, four, nothing more: an investigation of the conceptual sources of the verbal counting principles.

Authors:  Mathieu Le Corre; Susan Carey
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2007-01-08

4.  Chinese kindergartners' automatic processing of numerical magnitude in stroop-like tasks.

Authors:  Xinlin Zhou; Yao Chen; Chuansheng Chen; Ting Jiang; Hongchuan Zhang; Qi Dong
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-04

5.  Absolute and relative perceptual codes in young children.

Authors:  J Duffy; M T Zivian; A M Deboran
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1990-07

6.  The numerical distance effect is task dependent.

Authors:  Liat Goldfarb; Avishai Henik; Orly Rubinsten; Yafit Bloch-David; Limor Gertner
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-11

7.  The perception of number from the separability of the stimulus: the Stroop effect revisited.

Authors:  D Algom; A Dekel; A Pansky
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1996-09

8.  The psychophysics of numerical comparison: a reexamination of apparently incompatible data.

Authors:  S Dehaene
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1989-06

9.  Integers do not automatically activate their quantity representation.

Authors:  Dale J Cohen
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-04

10.  Developmental trajectories of magnitude processing and interference control: an FMRI study.

Authors:  Guilherme Wood; Anja Ischebeck; Florian Koppelstaetter; Thaddaeus Gotwald; Liane Kaufmann
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 5.357
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.