Literature DB >> 6162624

DNA extraction during Giemsa differentiation of chromatids singly and doubly substituted with BrdU.

L M Webber, J M Brasch, D R Smyth.   

Abstract

Human lymphocytes were cultured in 3H-labelled BrdU. Cells were pretreated to induce differentiation, autoradiographed and Giemsa-stained. DNA extraction was deduced if grain counts were lower in differentiated mitoses compared with untreated controls.--The differentiation method involved sequential pretreatments with short wave UV and 2 x SSc at 60 degrees C. This removed 34% of label from first division cells (with TB.TB chromosomes) but relatively more (53%) from second division (TB.BB chromosomes). In second division cells, about two thirds of label was lost from pale (BB) chromatids but only one third from dark (TB) chromatids. The UV and SSC pretreatments acted in collaboration, since neither alone reduced grain counts significantly.--On testing other methods, similar preferential DNA extraction was obtained with Perry and Wolff's FPG method, and with the hot salt pretreatment of Korenberg and Freedlender. However, good Giemsa differentiation could also be obtained using Hoechst 33258 and light pretreatments without any DNA loss. Reverse differentiation patterns (TB pale, BB dark) induced by warm acids resulted in extraction of nearly two thirds of 3H-BrdU label, but relative loss was the same from pale and dark chromatin. Direct reverse staining using alkaline Giemsa did not result in any loss of label.--Thus preferential DNA loss from pale stained chromatin underlies differentiation methods using light plus hot salt pretreatments, but it is not obligatory for good differentiation using other techniques.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1981        PMID: 6162624     DOI: 10.1007/BF00329580

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chromosoma        ISSN: 0009-5915            Impact factor:   4.316


  23 in total

1.  Histones bind more tightly to bromodeoxyuridine-substituted DNA than to normal DNA.

Authors:  S Lin; D Lin; A D Riggs
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1976-09       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Mechanisms involved in the banding of chromosomes with quinacrine and Giemsa. I. The effects of fixation in methanol-acetic acid.

Authors:  A T Sumner; H J Evans; R A Buckland
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  1973-09       Impact factor: 3.905

3.  Effects of 5-bromo-2'-deoxyuridine and dimethyl sulfoxide on properties and structure of chromatin.

Authors:  J N Lapeyre; I Bekhoe
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1974-10-15       Impact factor: 5.469

4.  Reverse differential staining of sister chromatids after substitution with BUdR and incubation in sodium phosphate solution.

Authors:  S I Sakanishi; S Takayama
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  1978-09       Impact factor: 3.905

Review 5.  Optical studies of metaphase chromosome organization.

Authors:  S A Latt
Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys Bioeng       Date:  1976

6.  Giemsa technique for the detection of sister chromatid exchanges.

Authors:  J R Korenberg; E F Freedlender
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1974       Impact factor: 4.316

7.  Involvement of sulfhydryl groups of chromosomal proteins in sister chromatid differentiation.

Authors:  C H Buys; S Stienstra
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 4.316

8.  Simple differential Giemsa staining of sister chromatids after treatment with photosensitive dyes and exposure to light and the mechanism of staining.

Authors:  K Goto; T Akematsu; H Shimazu; T Sugiyama
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1975-12-10       Impact factor: 4.316

9.  Increased thermal stability of chromatin containing 5-bromodeoxyuridine-substituted DNA.

Authors:  J David; J S Gordon; W J Rutter
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  New staining method for the detection of sister-chromatid exchanges in BrdU-labelled chromosomes.

Authors:  P Alves; J Jonasson
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  1978-08       Impact factor: 5.285

View more
  10 in total

1.  On the mechanism of differential Giemsa staining of bromodeoxyuridine-substituted chromosomes. II. Differences between the demonstration of sister chromatid differentiation and replication patterns.

Authors:  G Speit; S Haupter
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 4.132

2.  DNA lysis is involved in the simplified fluorescence plus Giemsa method for differential staining of sister chromatids.

Authors:  K Y Jan; J L Yang; P F Su
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 4.316

3.  Contradictory differential staining results with Coomassie Brilliant Blue and silver carbonate on sister chromatids.

Authors:  K Y Jan; S Wang-Wuu; W N Wen
Journal:  Experientia       Date:  1982-07-15

4.  DNA denaturation for ultrastructural banding and the mechanism underlying the fluorochrome-photolysis-Giemsa technique studied with anti-5-bromodeoxyuridine antibodies.

Authors:  R Drouin; P E Messier; C L Richer
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 4.316

5.  Considerations on the mechanism of differential Giemsa staining of BrdU-substituted chromosomes.

Authors:  G Speit
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 4.132

6.  Simultaneous production of R-bands and either replication patterns or sister chromatid differentiation.

Authors:  P M Kroisel; W Rosenkranz; D Schweizer
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 4.132

7.  Effects of bromodeoxyuridine substitution on metaphase chromosome structures examined by scanning electron microscopy.

Authors:  T Taniguchi; S Takayama
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 4.316

8.  On the mechanism of differential Giemsa staining of BrdU-substituted chromatids.

Authors:  G González-Gil; M H Navarrete
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 4.316

9.  Sister chromatid differentiation in 5-bromo-2'-deoxyuridine-substituted chromosomes: a study with DNA-specific ligands and monoclonal antibody to histone H2B.

Authors:  M Ribas; J R Korenberg; D Peretti; G Pichiri; J C Stockert; J Gosalvez; R Mezzanotte
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 5.239

10.  Differential inhibition of sister chromatid condensation induced by 5-azadeoxycytidine in human chromosomes.

Authors:  T Haaf; G Ott; M Schmid
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 4.316

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.