Literature DB >> 6158406

Binaural interaction in human auditory evoked potentials.

R A Dobie, S J Norton.   

Abstract

Binaural interaction (BI) in auditory evoked potentials was defined as any deviation from the predictions of a model which assumes two independent populations of neurons whose outputs are, in the far field, simply additive. Monaural responses are added to yield the model's prediction of binaurally evoked response; this trace is then subtracted from the actual binaural response to yield a difference trace which is considered to represent BI. In a previous study, strong BI was seen in guinea pig BSEP, maximal at about 4 msec latency; the interaction was greatest for simultaneous (delta t = 0) stimuli of equal intensitsy (delta I = 0). Sixteen normal young adults had BSEP and middle-latency auditory evoked potentials (middle AEP) recorded in response to binaural and monaural clicks. Although BI (in the 6 msec latency region) was observed in the difference trace for the majority of subjects' BSEP, there were no significant differences between binaural and predicted-binaural responses in the group means for individual peak amplitudes and latencies. In middle AEP, the amplitude of peak Pa was usually much smaller in binaurally evoked responses than in the predicted-binaural response. Four subjects had middle AEP which were felt to be predominantly myogenic on the basis of short latency and large amplitude; these responses demonstrated a reverse pattern of interaction, with binaural responses much larger than the monaural sums.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1980        PMID: 6158406     DOI: 10.1016/0013-4694(80)90224-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0013-4694


  17 in total

1.  [On the relation between binaural difference potentials and directional hearing].

Authors:  S Hoth; M Benz
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  Lateralization and Binaural Interaction of Middle-Latency and Late-Brainstem Components of the Auditory Evoked Response.

Authors:  Andrew R Dykstra; Daniel Burchard; Christian Starzynski; Helmut Riedel; Andre Rupp; Alexander Gutschalk
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-05-19

3.  Comparison of two cortical measures of binaural hearing acuity.

Authors:  Won So; Spencer B Smith
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2020-12-21       Impact factor: 2.117

4.  Development of surface-recorded cochlear and early neural potentials in the cat.

Authors:  E Laukli; I W Mair
Journal:  Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1981

Review 5.  The Physiological Basis and Clinical Use of the Binaural Interaction Component of the Auditory Brainstem Response.

Authors:  Geneviève Laumen; Alexander T Ferber; Georg M Klump; Daniel J Tollin
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Test-Retest Reliability of the Binaural Interaction Component of the Auditory Brainstem Response.

Authors:  Alexander T Ferber; Victor Benichoux; Daniel J Tollin
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  N2ac: an ERP component associated with the focusing of attention within an auditory scene.

Authors:  Marissa L Gamble; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2011-01-24       Impact factor: 4.016

8.  Neural coding of interaural time differences with bilateral cochlear implants: effects of congenital deafness.

Authors:  Kenneth E Hancock; Victor Noel; David K Ryugo; Bertrand Delgutte
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-10-20       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Effects of stimulation level and electrode pairing on the binaural interaction component of the electrically evoked auditory brain stem response.

Authors:  Shuman He; Carolyn J Brown; Paul J Abbas
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  The postauricular myogenic response in normal children and children with microtia.

Authors:  N Takagi; T Suzuki; K Matsuo; K Kobayashi
Journal:  Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1984
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.