Literature DB >> 615785

X-ray examination of endoscopy? A blind prospective study including barium meal, double contrast examiniation, and endoscopy of esophagus, stomach, and duodenum.

N Hedemand, A Kruse, E H Madsen, M S Mathiasen.   

Abstract

One hundred and one consecutive patients with upper abdominal dyspepsia were examined by conventional barium meal, double contrast examination, and endoscopy of the stomach and the duodenum in a blind prospective investigation. All the examiners were specially trained. Only small differences between the sensitivity and the specificity of the methods were found, but the clinical importance of the false positive and the false negative errors of the three methods of examination was not the same. The sensitivity of the ordinary X-ray examination was found to be sufficiently high for still recommending this method for primary screening. In case of posivite findings in the stomach, supplementary gastroscopy ought to be performed in order to increase the diagnostic specificity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1977        PMID: 615785

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol        ISSN: 0364-2356


  10 in total

1.  [A comparison of radiology and endoscopy in the diagnosis of gastric and duodenal ulcers(author's transl)].

Authors:  H S Stender; E Seigert; G Luska; P Otto
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  1975-05

2.  The diagnostic accuracy of barium studies of the stomach and duodenum--correlation with endoscopy.

Authors:  I Laufer; J E Mullens; J Hamilton
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1975-06       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  [A diagnostic study of patients with upper abdominal pain].

Authors:  V O Praksis
Journal:  Ugeskr Laeger       Date:  1976-01-26

4.  [A comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of radiology and endoscopy in diseases of the stomach and duodenum (author's transl)].

Authors:  M Renner; E Böttger; H P Adolphs; B C Manegold
Journal:  Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Nuklearmed       Date:  1974-12

5.  [Endoscopic and radiological investigation in ulceration and cancer of the stomach].

Authors:  E Kristensen; O M Jensen
Journal:  Ugeskr Laeger       Date:  1974-01-21

6.  [Radiographic examination of the stomach with double contrast. Use of highly concentrated contrast media with low viscosity].

Authors:  N Hedemand; M S Mathiasen
Journal:  Ugeskr Laeger       Date:  1974-05-13

7.  [Letter: Endoscopic and radiologic examination of the ventricle].

Authors:  C E Gudbjerg; H R Wulff; M R Wulff
Journal:  Ugeskr Laeger       Date:  1974-02-18

8.  Gastric pseudolesions: roentgenographic-gastrophotographic correlation.

Authors:  L Calenoff; M Sparberg
Journal:  Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med       Date:  1971-09

9.  Fibre-optic endoscopy and radiology in the investigation of the ipper gastrointestinatract.

Authors:  D C Cumberland
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  1975-04       Impact factor: 2.350

10.  [The accuracy of radiological and endoscopic examinations in the diagnosis of carcinoma of the stomach (author's transl)].

Authors:  H S Stender; E Seifert; G Luska; H H Wagner
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  1976-04
  10 in total
  4 in total

1.  Costs of gastrointestinal examinations: a comparative study.

Authors:  D W Gelfand; D J Ott; R Tritico
Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol       Date:  1978-06-25

2.  The stomach after surgery. An endoscopic perspective.

Authors:  T A Bowden; V H Hooks; A R Mansberger
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Causes of error in gastrointestinal radiology. I. Upper gastrointestinal examination.

Authors:  D W Gelfand; D J Ott; R Tritico
Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol       Date:  1980-04-30

4.  Upper gastrointestinal series: patient management and a study of 199 cases.

Authors:  H A Munitz; D W Gelfand; D J Ott
Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol       Date:  1985
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.