Literature DB >> 4029544

Upper gastrointestinal series: patient management and a study of 199 cases.

H A Munitz, D W Gelfand, D J Ott.   

Abstract

Records of 199 patients were analyzed retrospectively after upper gastrointestinal (UGI) series to assess its impact on patient management. Symptoms most predictive of an abnormal UGI series were dysphagia, UGI hemorrhage, abdominal pain, and chest pain. However, 23% of inpatients with seemingly trivial symptoms had shown abnormal results of the study. Overall sensitivity of the UGI series was 65%, which rose to 82% if esophagitis, gastritis, and abnormalities of the postoperative stomach were excluded. Effects on patient management included: serious pathologic change ruled out (53%), further studies ordered (21%), change of therapy (17%), existing therapy continued (16%), surgery performed (7%), and radiologic abnormality ignored (5%). In no case did the combination of initial screening by UGI series followed by endoscopy as indicated lead to subsequently reported morbidity or mortality due to a failure of diagnosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4029544     DOI: 10.1007/bf01893112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol        ISSN: 0364-2356


  9 in total

1.  An evaluation of the double contrast barium meal (DCBM) against endoscopy.

Authors:  H Herlinger; J N Glanville; L Kreel
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  1977-05       Impact factor: 2.350

2.  Double-blind study of single and double contrast upper gastrointestinal examinations using endoscopy as a control.

Authors:  J P Montagne; A A Moss; A R Margulis
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1978-06       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Selection criteria for upper gastrointestinal examinations: attempts at improvement.

Authors:  B J McNeil; A Wijesinha; T E Bynum; R A Greenes; A Berenberg; F X Van Houten; S Ratnofsky; D Millan; H L Abrams
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1984-02       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 4.  Accuracy and reliability of endoscopy and x-ray in upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

Authors:  J L Lichtenstein
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  X-ray examination of endoscopy? A blind prospective study including barium meal, double contrast examiniation, and endoscopy of esophagus, stomach, and duodenum.

Authors:  N Hedemand; A Kruse; E H Madsen; M S Mathiasen
Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol       Date:  1977-05-25

6.  Fibre-optic endoscopy and radiology in the investigation of the ipper gastrointestinatract.

Authors:  D C Cumberland
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  1975-04       Impact factor: 2.350

7.  Single- vs. double-contrast gastrointestinal studies: critical analysis of reported statistics.

Authors:  D W Gelfand; D J Ott
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  Upper gastrointestinal barium studies in the elderly: follow-up in 101 patients.

Authors:  P Twining; A K Dixon; D Rubenstein; W Davison
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 2.350

9.  A comparison of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and radiography.

Authors:  T R Martin; J A Vennes; S E Silvis; H J Ansel
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 3.062

  9 in total
  1 in total

1.  Capsule endoscopy changes patient management in routine clinical practice.

Authors:  Reena Sidhu; David S Sanders; Kapil Kapur; David P Hurlstone; Mark E McAlindon
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2007-03-15       Impact factor: 3.199

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.