Literature DB >> 6157786

A comparison between microcrystalline and conventional phenytoin preparations: relative bioavailability and steady-state plasma concentrations.

L O Boréus, A Nergårdh, M Ehrnebo, K Theorell.   

Abstract

Plasma concentrations of two phenytoin products (a conventional phenytoin acid preparation and a microcrystalline form of phenytoin acid) were studied after single dose administration and during steady-state conditions in four healthy male volunteers. Relative bioavailability for the conventional tablet in comparison with the microcrystallin was in the range of 48-80% during single dose administration and in the range 54-95% at steady-rate. The microcrystalline preparation gave, as expected, a higher rate of absorption. During steady-state conditions, however, this higher rate of absorption was associated with considerable fluctuations in plamsa concentration during the dosage interval. The mean maximum plasma concentration was about 50% high than the value at the beginning of the dose interval (2-dose concentration value) when the microcrystalline product was administered. The corresponding figure was only about 25% for the conventional tablet. Since upward fluctuations in plasma concentrations may be associated with side effects, the more even level obtained with the conventional product may be an advantage from the clinical point of view. An incresed rate of bioavailability is not a clinical improvement if it occurs at the expense of greater fluctuations in plasma concentration during the dose interval.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1980        PMID: 6157786     DOI: 10.1007/BF00313338

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol        ISSN: 0340-5354            Impact factor:   4.849


  9 in total

1.  [Biological availability--a comparison between 3 phenytoin preparations].

Authors:  G Alván; A Bertler; O Eeg-Olofsson; E Karlsson; F Sjöqvist; G Tomson
Journal:  Lakartidningen       Date:  1975-06-11

2.  Studies on 5, 5'-diphenylhydantoin (dilantin) in animals and man.

Authors:  W A DILL; A J GLAZKO; A KAZENKO; L M WOLF
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1956-11       Impact factor: 4.030

3.  Bioavailability of phenytoin. A comparison of two preparations.

Authors:  M J Stewart; B R Ballinger; E J Devlin; A Y Miller; A C Ramsay
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1975-12-19       Impact factor: 2.953

4.  Nonlinear assessment of phenytoin bioavailability.

Authors:  W J Jusko; J R Koup; G Alván
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1976-08

Review 5.  Pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic measurements of antiepileptic drugs.

Authors:  H Kutt
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 6.875

6.  Clinical significance of generic inequivalence of three different pharmaceutical preparations of phenytoin.

Authors:  L Lund
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1974       Impact factor: 2.953

7.  Bioavailability of 11 phenytoin products.

Authors:  A P Melikian; A B Straughn; G W Slywka; P L Whyatt; M C Meyer
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1977-04

8.  Bioavailability of four brands of phenytoin tablets.

Authors:  P J Pentikäinen; P J Neuvonen; S M Elfving
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1975-12-19       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 9.  Bioavailability of phenytoin: clinical pharmacokinetic and therapeutic implications.

Authors:  P J Neuvonen
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1979 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.447

  9 in total
  2 in total

1.  Plasma concentrations of valproate during maintenance therapy in epileptic children.

Authors:  B Lundberg; A Nergårdh; L O Boréus
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 4.849

2.  Monitoring of phenytoin in epileptic children: value of the single morning sample.

Authors:  A S Naglo; A Nergårdh; L O Boréus
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 4.849

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.