OBJECTIVE: This study characterized the brain electrical activity during pedaling, a locomotor-like task, in humans. We postulated that phasic brain activity would be associated with active pedaling, consistent with a cortical role in locomotor tasks. METHODS: Sixty four channels of electroencephalogram (EEG) and 10 channels of electromyogram (EMG) data were recorded from 10 neurologically-intact volunteers while they performed active and passive (no effort) pedaling on a custom-designed stationary bicycle. Ensemble averaged waveforms, 2 dimensional topographic maps and amplitude of the β (13-35 Hz) frequency band were analyzed and compared between active and passive trials. RESULTS: The peak-to-peak amplitude (peak positive-peak negative) of the EEG waveform recorded at the Cz electrode was higher in the passive than the active trials (p < 0.01). β-band oscillations in electrodes overlying the leg representation area of the cortex were significantly desynchronized during active compared to the passive pedaling (p < 0.01). A significant negative correlation was observed between the average EEG waveform for active trials and the composite EMG (summated EMG from both limbs for each muscle) of the rectus femoris (r = -0.77, p < 0.01) the medial hamstrings (r = -0.85, p < 0.01) and the tibialis anterior (r = -0.70, p < 0.01) muscles. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrated that substantial sensorimotor processing occurs in the brain during pedaling in humans. Further, cortical activity seemed to be greatest during recruitment of the muscles critical for transitioning the legs from flexion to extension and vice versa. SIGNIFICANCE: This is the first study demonstrating the feasibility of EEG recording during pedaling, and owing to similarities between pedaling and bipedal walking, may provide valuable insight into brain activity during locomotion in humans.
OBJECTIVE: This study characterized the brain electrical activity during pedaling, a locomotor-like task, in humans. We postulated that phasic brain activity would be associated with active pedaling, consistent with a cortical role in locomotor tasks. METHODS: Sixty four channels of electroencephalogram (EEG) and 10 channels of electromyogram (EMG) data were recorded from 10 neurologically-intact volunteers while they performed active and passive (no effort) pedaling on a custom-designed stationary bicycle. Ensemble averaged waveforms, 2 dimensional topographic maps and amplitude of the β (13-35 Hz) frequency band were analyzed and compared between active and passive trials. RESULTS: The peak-to-peak amplitude (peak positive-peak negative) of the EEG waveform recorded at the Cz electrode was higher in the passive than the active trials (p < 0.01). β-band oscillations in electrodes overlying the leg representation area of the cortex were significantly desynchronized during active compared to the passive pedaling (p < 0.01). A significant negative correlation was observed between the average EEG waveform for active trials and the composite EMG (summated EMG from both limbs for each muscle) of the rectus femoris (r = -0.77, p < 0.01) the medial hamstrings (r = -0.85, p < 0.01) and the tibialis anterior (r = -0.70, p < 0.01) muscles. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrated that substantial sensorimotor processing occurs in the brain during pedaling in humans. Further, cortical activity seemed to be greatest during recruitment of the muscles critical for transitioning the legs from flexion to extension and vice versa. SIGNIFICANCE: This is the first study demonstrating the feasibility of EEG recording during pedaling, and owing to similarities between pedaling and bipedal walking, may provide valuable insight into brain activity during locomotion in humans.
Authors: Gernot R Müller-Putz; Doris Zimmermann; Bernhard Graimann; Kurt Nestinger; Gerd Korisek; Gert Pfurtscheller Journal: Brain Res Date: 2006-12-22 Impact factor: 3.252
Authors: Sheila Schindler-Ivens; David A Brown; Gwyn N Lewis; Jens Bo Nielsen; Kathy L Ondishko; Jon Wieser Journal: Exp Brain Res Date: 2008-04-22 Impact factor: 1.972
Authors: O Ciccarelli; A T Toosy; J F Marsden; C M Wheeler-Kingshott; C Sahyoun; P M Matthews; D H Miller; A J Thompson Journal: Exp Brain Res Date: 2005-07-21 Impact factor: 1.972
Authors: Hendrik Enders; Filomeno Cortese; Christian Maurer; Jennifer Baltich; Andrea B Protzner; Benno M Nigg Journal: J Neurophysiol Date: 2015-11-04 Impact factor: 2.714
Authors: S Floor Campfens; Alfred C Schouten; Michel J A M van Putten; Herman van der Kooij Journal: Exp Brain Res Date: 2013-05-12 Impact factor: 1.972
Authors: Pedro M R Reis; Felix Hebenstreit; Florian Gabsteiger; Vinzenz von Tscharner; Matthias Lochmann Journal: Front Hum Neurosci Date: 2014-03-24 Impact factor: 3.169
Authors: Thomas C Bulea; Jonghyun Kim; Diane L Damiano; Christopher J Stanley; Hyung-Soon Park Journal: Front Hum Neurosci Date: 2015-05-12 Impact factor: 3.169
Authors: Jesus G Cruz-Garza; Zachery R Hernandez; Sargoon Nepaul; Karen K Bradley; Jose L Contreras-Vidal Journal: Front Hum Neurosci Date: 2014-04-08 Impact factor: 3.169
Authors: Angela L Ridgel; Robert S Phillips; Benjamin L Walter; Fred M Discenzo; Kenneth A Loparo Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2015-09-02 Impact factor: 4.003