Literature DB >> 6153354

Sex differences in the amplitudes and latencies of the human auditory brain stem potential.

H J Michalewski, L W Thompson, J V Patterson, T E Bowman, D Litzelman.   

Abstract

Sex differences in the amplitudes and latencies of the auditory brain stem potential (BAEP) were investigated using 3 levels of intensity and 3 stimulus presentation rates. The females displayed consistently larger BAEPs for waves IV, V, VI, VII than the males. The only latency differences which reached significance over all the intensities and rates occurred for wave V. The females showed significantly shorter wave V latencies than the males. Since hearing losses and individually determined click thresholds were comparable between the two groups tested, the exact sources of the uneven distribution of amplitude and latency effects are in question. Differences in the relative distances of the anatomical generators are considered in accounting for the sex differences. Because the precise origin of the sex differences cannot be stated with certainty at this time, attempts to develop normative data for the BAEP should consider the possible influences of sex differences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1980        PMID: 6153354     DOI: 10.1016/0013-4694(80)90271-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0013-4694


  9 in total

1.  Auditory brainstem responses in 10 inbred strains of mice.

Authors:  Xiaoming Zhou; Philip H-S Jen; Kevin L Seburn; Wayne N Frankel; Qing Y Zheng
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2006-03-03       Impact factor: 3.252

2.  Age-related changes of auditory brainstem responses in nonhuman primates.

Authors:  Chi-Wing Ng; Xochi Navarro; James R Engle; Gregg H Recanzone
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Sex differences in auditory subcortical function.

Authors:  Jennifer Krizman; Erika Skoe; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-09-08       Impact factor: 3.708

4.  The summating potential in human electrocochleography: Gaussian models and Fourier analysis.

Authors:  Kenneth E Hancock; Bennett O'Brien; Rosamaria Santarelli; M Charles Liberman; Stéphane F Maison
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-10       Impact factor: 2.482

5.  Impairment of optic path due to radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Wei-Han Hu; Min-Zhong Yu; Shi-Xian Long; Shi-Zhou Huang; Mo-Fa Gu; Lan-Sun Zhou; De-Zheng Wu
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.379

6.  Brainstem auditory evoked potentials suggest a role for the ventral cochlear nucleus in tinnitus.

Authors:  Jianwen Wendy Gu; Barbara S Herrmann; Robert A Levine; Jennifer R Melcher
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-08-07

7.  Stability of Early Auditory Evoked Potential Components Over Extended Test-Retest Intervals in Young Adults.

Authors:  Rebecca E Bieber; Katharine Fernandez; Chris Zalewski; Hui Cheng; Carmen C Brewer
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.562

8.  Toward a Differential Diagnosis of Hidden Hearing Loss in Humans.

Authors:  M Charles Liberman; Michael J Epstein; Sandra S Cleveland; Haobing Wang; Stéphane F Maison
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-12       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Tinnitus with a normal audiogram: Relation to noise exposure but no evidence for cochlear synaptopathy.

Authors:  Hannah Guest; Kevin J Munro; Garreth Prendergast; Simon Howe; Christopher J Plack
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2016-12-11       Impact factor: 3.208

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.