Literature DB >> 6152238

Written simulation of patient-doctor encounters. 3. Comparison of the performance in the simulation with prescription and referral data in reality.

M M Kuyvenhoven, H M Jacobs, F W Touw-Otten, J C van Es.   

Abstract

The performance of 19 general practitioners in a written simulation of patient-doctor encounters was compared with real data on prescription and referral from 'sick-fund' patients. Two issues were studied: the amounts of certain drugs prescribed (analgesics and antirheumatics; hypnotics/sedatives and tranquillizers; neuroleptics and antidepressants) and the number of referrals to specialists. In the simulation, experts assessed the 'risk of unnecessary harm to the patient' induced by the therapeutic procedures of these general practitioners, as described previously. A close correlation was found between the ratings of the risk of unnecessary harm in the simulation and the prescription and referral data in reality for general practitioners who were consistently generous or frugal in prescribing the above drugs and referring the patients to specialists. The tentative conclusion is that the written simulation with its rating procedure discriminates reliably between general practitioners who induce less risk of unnecessary harm from those who are likely to cause harm to the patient.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6152238     DOI: 10.1093/fampra/1.1.25

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Pract        ISSN: 0263-2136            Impact factor:   2.267


  3 in total

1.  Comparing the quality of referrals of general practitioners with high and average referral rates: an independent panel review.

Authors:  J A Knottnerus; J Joosten; J Daams
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Analysis of referral behaviour: responses to simulated case histories may not reflect real clinical behaviour.

Authors:  D C Morrell; M O Roland
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Management of upper respiratory tract infection in Dutch general practice.

Authors:  R A de Melker; M M Kuyvenhoven
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 5.386

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.