Literature DB >> 2114132

Analysis of referral behaviour: responses to simulated case histories may not reflect real clinical behaviour.

D C Morrell1, M O Roland.   

Abstract

In an attempt to develop a measure of the referral behaviour of general practitioners, 21 simulated case histories were constructed which presented between three and six stages at which a decision was required whether or not refer a 'patient' to hospital. Twenty general practitioners completed the case histories and their responses were compared with their referral rates to outpatient departments. No significant correlations were found between the doctors' responses to the vignettes and their actual referral rates, and the repeatability of the vignettes was disappointing. The fact that the case histories appeared realistic to the doctors who completed them was not reflected in objective measures of their validity. Simulated case histories should not be used as a method of measuring doctors' behaviour without establishing their validity and reliability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2114132      PMCID: PMC1371274     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Gen Pract        ISSN: 0960-1643            Impact factor:   5.386


  16 in total

1.  Further observations on diagnosis and management of general practice respiratory illness using simulated patient consultations.

Authors:  J G Howie
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1974-06-08

2.  Doctors as decision-makers: a computer-assisted study of diagnosis as a cognitive skill.

Authors:  T R Taylor; J Aitchison; E M McGirr
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1971-07-03

3.  Patient management problems. Issues of validity.

Authors:  D I Newble; J Hoare; A Baxter
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 6.251

4.  Written simulation of patient-doctor encounters. 1. Research instrument for registration of the performance of general practitioners.

Authors:  M M Kuyvenhoven; H M Jacobs; F W Touw-Otten; J C van Es
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 2.267

5.  Judging "current disease activity" in rheumatoid arthritis--an international comparison.

Authors:  J R Kirwan; N Bellamy; H Condon; W W Buchanan; C G Barnes
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 4.666

6.  Antibiotic use in otitis media: patient simulations as an aid to audit.

Authors:  D M Chaput de Saintonge; N R Hathaway
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1981-10-03

7.  General practitioner referrals to hospital: the financial implications of variability.

Authors:  D L Crombie; D M Fleming
Journal:  Health Trends       Date:  1988-05

8.  Clinical judgment in rheumatoid arthritis. I. Rheumatologists' opinions and the development of 'paper patients'.

Authors:  J R Kirwan; D M Chaput de Saintonge; C R Joyce; H L Currey
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 19.103

9.  Performance on PMPs and performance in practice: are they related?

Authors:  G G Page; D W Fielding
Journal:  J Med Educ       Date:  1980-06

10.  A comparison of behaviour on simulated patients and patient management problems.

Authors:  G R Norman; J W Feightner
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 6.251

View more
  9 in total

1.  Factors affecting physicians' decisions to forgo life-sustaining treatments in terminal care.

Authors:  H Hinkka; E Kosunen; R Metsänoja; U-K Lammi; P Kellokumpu-Lehtinen
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.903

2.  The inability of physicians to predict the outcome of in-hospital resuscitation.

Authors:  M H Ebell; G R Bergus; L Warbasse; R Bloomer
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Effect of nonmedical factors on family physicians' decisions about referral for consultation.

Authors:  G R Langley; A M MacLellan; H J Sutherland; J E Till
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1992-09-01       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Potential unintended consequences due to Medicare's "no pay for errors" rule? A randomized controlled trial of an educational intervention with internal medicine residents.

Authors:  Somnath Mookherjee; Arpana R Vidyarthi; Sumant R Ranji; Judy Maselli; Robert M Wachter; Robert B Baron
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Management of upper respiratory tract infection in Dutch general practice.

Authors:  R A de Melker; M M Kuyvenhoven
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 5.386

6.  Reported management of patients with sore throat in Australian general practice.

Authors:  N F Carr; S G Wales; D Young
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 5.386

7.  Which factors decided general practitioners' choice of hospital on behalf of their patients in an area with free choice of public hospital? A questionnaire study.

Authors:  Hans O Birk; Lars O Henriksen
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-05-25       Impact factor: 2.655

8.  Testing the effectiveness of an innovative information package on practitioner reported behaviour and beliefs: the UK Chiropractors, Osteopaths and Musculoskeletal Physiotherapists Low back pain ManagemENT (COMPLeMENT) trial [ISRCTN77245761].

Authors:  David W Evans; Nadine E Foster; Martin Underwood; Steven Vogel; Alan C Breen; Tamar Pincus
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2005-07-20       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  The effect of improving task representativeness on capturing nurses' risk assessment judgements: a comparison of written case simulations and physical simulations.

Authors:  Huiqin Yang; Carl Thompson; Robert M Hamm; Martin Bland; Alison Foster
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2013-05-30       Impact factor: 2.796

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.