Literature DB >> 6148482

Multivariate analysis of prognostic factors for operable rectal cancer.

L S Freedman, P Macaskill, A N Smith.   

Abstract

Previous reports have established that several variables are of prognostic importance in rectal cancer. The information from a Medical Research Council trial in seventeen centres in the United Kingdom was used to assess the simultaneous contribution of several of these factors in a multivariate analysis. In the preoperative assessment mobility of the tumour and the number of quadrants involved were predictive of the likelihood of a curative resection being possible. Among patients who had curative resections, prognosis was influenced by Dukes' classification, height of tumour, histological grade, and venous invasion. A scoring system based on these criteria was constructed and applied to this group of patients. It successfully defined five prognostic groups with 5-year survival rates ranging from 80% to 19%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6148482     DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(84)92636-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  31 in total

1.  Systematic review of prognostic importance of extramural venous invasion in rectal cancer.

Authors:  Manish Chand; Muhammed R S Siddiqui; Ian Swift; Gina Brown
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  How Should Imaging Direct/Orient Management of Rectal Cancer?

Authors:  Jemma Bhoday; Svetlana Balyasnikova; Anita Wale; Gina Brown
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2017-11-27

3.  Outcome after proctectomy for rectal cancer in Department of Veterans Affairs Hospitals: a report from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.

Authors:  W E Longo; K S Virgo; F E Johnson; T P Wade; A M Vernava; M A Phelan; W G Henderson; J Daley; S F Khuri
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Adjuvant therapy decisions based on magnetic resonance imaging of extramural venous invasion and other prognostic factors in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  M Chand; R I Swift; I Chau; R J Heald; P P Tekkis; G Brown
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 5.  Staging of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  P H Chapuis; M F Dixon; L P Fielding; P H Gordon; P Hermanek; M Kyriakos; S D Nathanson; R C Newland; G D Oates; P Quirke
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Rectal cancer: factors influencing the development of local recurrence after radical anterior resection.

Authors:  W Feil; M Wunderlich; E Kovats; N Neuhold; M Schemper; E Wenzl; R Schiessel
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Comparison of three classifications for lymph node evaluation in patients undergoing total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Johannes Fritzmann; Pietro Contin; Christoph Reissfelder; Markus W Büchler; Jürgen Weitz; Nuh N Rahbari; Alexis B Ulrich
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 3.445

8.  Colorectal carcinoma grading by quantifying poorly differentiated cell clusters is more reproducible and provides more robust prognostic information than conventional grading.

Authors:  Valeria Barresi; Luca Reggiani Bonetti; Giovanni Branca; Carmela Di Gregorio; Maurizio Ponz de Leon; Giovanni Tuccari
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 4.064

9.  The pathologist's role in rectal cancer patient assessments.

Authors:  Joseph E Willis
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2007-08

Review 10.  Proforma-based reporting in rectal cancer.

Authors:  F Taylor; N Mangat; I R Swift; G Brown
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2010-10-04       Impact factor: 3.909

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.