Literature DB >> 6135607

Modulation of tumor promotion in liver carcinogenesis.

H Shinozuka, S E Abanobi, B Lombardi.   

Abstract

Earlier, we demonstrated that feeding to rats a diet devoid of choline, a lipotropic factor, markedly enhances hepatoma induction by several chemical carcinogens, and that the diet acts as a strong promoter of the evolution of initiated cells to foci of altered hepatocytes. The ability of several factors to modulate the action of the choline-devoid (CD) diet as a promoter was investigated by quantitating the foci of gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase-positive hepatocytes developed in rats exposed to a single injection of diethylnitrosamine. Addition to the diet of phenobarbital (PHB) resulted in a promoting action stronger than those of the CD diet or of PHB alone. Two other barbiturates, amobarbital (AMB) and pentobarbital (PTB) exerted an effect similar to that of PHB, while barbituric acid (BA) had no effect. In other studies, lowering the fat content of the CD diet reduced its efficacy as a promotor, while the addition of a hypolipidemic agent, BR931, 4-chloro-6-(2,3 xylidino)-2-pyrimidinylthio (N-beta-hydroxy-ethyl)acetamide, completely abolished the promoting action of the CD diet. In rats not exposed to carcinogen, feeding the CD diet caused a marked enhancement of liver DNA synthesis and of cell proliferation. Inclusion of PHB, PTB or AMB in the CD diet inhibited these effects, while BA exerted no inhibition. The increased rate of DNA synthesis and cell proliferation in the liver were not affected by the level of fat in the CD diet. These results suggest that beside a stimulation of liver cell proliferation, other factor(s) determine the efficacy with which a CD diet exerts its promoting action.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6135607      PMCID: PMC1569229          DOI: 10.1289/ehp.8350163

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Health Perspect        ISSN: 0091-6765            Impact factor:   9.031


  22 in total

1.  Azaserine carcinogenesis: organ susceptibility change in rats fed a diet devoid of choline.

Authors:  H Shinozuka; S L Katyal; B Lombardi
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1978-07-15       Impact factor: 7.396

Review 2.  Dietary fat in relation to tumorigenesis.

Authors:  K K Carroll; H T Khor
Journal:  Prog Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  1975

3.  Effects of varying the exposure to phenobarbital on its enhancement of 2-acetylaminofluorene-induced hepatic tumorigenesis in the rat.

Authors:  C Peraino; R J Fry; E Staffeldt; W E Kisieleski
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1973-11       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 4.  Radiation carcinogenesis: the sequence of events.

Authors:  L J Cole; P C Nowell
Journal:  Science       Date:  1965-12-31       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Nutrition and experimental carcinogenesis: a review.

Authors:  D B Clayson
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1975-11       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 6.  Dietary effects on chemical carcinogenesis in animal models for colon and liver tumors.

Authors:  A E Rogers; P M Newberne
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1975-11       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  Variable effects of a lipotrope-deficient, high-fat diet on chemical carcinogenesis in rats.

Authors:  A E Rogers
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1975-09       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  Early histological and functional alterations of ethionine liver carcinogenesis in rats fed a choline-deficient diet.

Authors:  H Shinozuka; B Lombardi; S Sell; R M Iammarino
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1978-04       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  Repeated partial hepatectomy as a promoting stimulus for carcinogenic response of liver to nitrosamines in rats.

Authors:  A W Pound; L J McGuire
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1978-04       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Influence of repeated liver regeneration on hepatic carcinogenesis by diethylnitrosamine in mice.

Authors:  A W Poound; L J McGuire
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1978-04       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  1 in total

1.  Concentration-dependent inhibition of development of GGT positive foci in rat liver by the environmental contaminant di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate.

Authors:  A B DeAngelo; A E Queral; C T Garrett
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 9.031

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.