Literature DB >> 6091474

Antibiotic prophylaxis in high-risk biliary operations: multicenter trial of single preoperative ceftriaxone versus multidose cefazolin.

J M Kellum, S Gargano, S L Gorbach, C Talcof, L E Curtis, B Weiner, M McCoobery, J S Tan, T Kelly, D Wagner.   

Abstract

A prospective, double-blind trial of a single preoperative dose of ceftriaxone, a new long-acting cephalosporin, versus one preoperative and three postoperative doses of cefazolin was carried out in 81 patients at high risk of infection after biliary surgery. Indications for antibiotic prophylaxis included recent or ongoing cholecystitis (52 patients), common duct stones (14 patients), common duct obstruction (3 patients), and age greater than 70 years (22 patients). Intraoperative bile cultures were positive in 7 of 41 patients (17.1 percent) given ceftriaxone and 12 of 40 patients (30 percent) given cefazolin, but there were no wound infections in either group. Neither regimen was associated with significant antibiotic resistance. Side effects, such as proteinuria and elevated liver transaminases and alkaline phosphatase levels, were transient and not definitely related to the antibiotics. We conclude that a single preoperative dose of ceftriaxone is as effective as multiple perioperative doses of cefazolin in the prophylaxis of infection associated with biliary tract surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6091474

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  7 in total

1.  A prospective randomized study to assess the optimal duration of intravenous antimicrobial prophylaxis in elective gastric cancer surgery.

Authors:  Norihiro Haga; Hideyuki Ishida; Toru Ishiguro; Kensuke Kumamoto; Keiichiro Ishibashi; Yoshitaka Tsuji; Tatsuya Miyazaki
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  2012 Apr-Jun

Review 2.  Ceftriaxone. A reappraisal of its antibacterial activity and pharmacokinetic properties, and an update on its therapeutic use with particular reference to once-daily administration.

Authors:  R N Brogden; A Ward
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  Infectious complications after 809 biliary tract operations and results of a prospective randomized single-blind study comparing cefoxitin versus ampicillin plus an inhibitor of beta-lactamases.

Authors:  D H Wittmann; P Koltowski; J Oleszkiewicz; A P Walker
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1990 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.553

4.  [Complications in pre- versus intraoperative one-time prophylaxis with cefuroxime after biliary surgery].

Authors:  F Neidel
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 3.553

5.  A meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials assessing the prophylactic use of ceftriaxone. A study of wound, chest, and urinary infections.

Authors:  J C Woodfield; N Beshay; A M van Rij
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Prophylactic antibiotics for patients undergoing elective biliary tract surgery: a prospective randomized study of cefotiam and cefoperazone.

Authors:  N Shinagawa; Y Tachi; S Ishikawa; J Yura
Journal:  Jpn J Surg       Date:  1987-01

7.  Ceftriaxone versus Other Antibiotics for Surgical Prophylaxis : A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Silvano Esposito; Silvana Noviello; Alessandro Vanasia; Paola Venturino
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.859

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.