Literature DB >> 608798

A controlled trial of multiphasic screening in middle-age: results of the South-East London Screening Study. The South-East London Screening Study Group.

.   

Abstract

The results of a controlled trial of multiphasic screening in general practice are presented. In 1967, 7,229 individuals aged between 40 and 64 years were randomly allocated into either a Screening or Control group. The Screening group were invited to attend two screening sessions held about two years apart, while the Control group continued to receive conventional medical care. Both groups were then invited to undergo a health survey in 1972-73 which revealed no significant differences in morbidity between the two groups. Careful follow-up permitted detailed Screening-Control comparisons of various outcome measures--consultation and hospital admission rates, certified sickness absence from work, and mortality. Nine years after the initial screening, no significant differences were found between the two groups in any of the outcome measures. It is estimated that a similar screening programme for the entire middle-aged UK population would cost 142 pounds million at 1976 prices.

Mesh:

Year:  1977        PMID: 608798     DOI: 10.1093/ije/6.4.357

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0300-5771            Impact factor:   7.196


  17 in total

Review 1.  Principles of cancer screening: lessons from history and study design issues.

Authors:  Jennifer M Croswell; David F Ransohoff; Barnett S Kramer
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 4.929

2.  The association between annually-repeated health screening and health behavior among company employees.

Authors:  A Hagihara; K Tarumi; K Morimoto
Journal:  Environ Health Prev Med       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 3.674

Review 3.  Effectiveness of general practice-based health checks: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Si Si; John R Moss; Thomas R Sullivan; Skye S Newton; Nigel P Stocks
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 4.  Multiple risk factor interventions for primary prevention of coronary heart disease.

Authors:  S Ebrahim; A Beswick; M Burke; G Davey Smith
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2006-10-18

5.  Prevention--everybody's responsibility.

Authors:  W W Holland; A Wainwright
Journal:  Soz Praventivmed       Date:  1978-12

6.  Effectiveness of screening older people for impaired vision in community setting: systematic review of evidence from randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  L Smeeth; S Iliffe
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-02-28

7.  Long-term effect of population screening for diabetes on cardiovascular morbidity, self-rated health, and health behavior.

Authors:  Justin B Echouffo-Tcheugui; Rebecca K Simmons; A Toby Prevost; Kate M Williams; Ann-Louise Kinmonth; Nicholas J Wareham; Simon J Griffin
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 5.166

8.  Ebeltoft project: baseline data from a five-year randomized, controlled, prospective health promotion study in a Danish population.

Authors:  T Lauritzen; C Leboeuf-Yde; I M Lunde; K D Nielsen
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 5.386

9.  NHS Health Check comorbidity and management: an observational matched study in primary care.

Authors:  John Robson; Isabel Dostal; Vichithranie Madurasinghe; Aziz Sheikh; Sally Hull; Kambiz Boomla; Chris Griffiths; Sandra Eldridge
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2016-12-19       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 10.  Systematic versus opportunistic risk assessment for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Mariana Dyakova; Saran Shantikumar; Jill L Colquitt; Christian M Drew; Morag Sime; Joanna MacIver; Nicola Wright; Aileen Clarke; Karen Rees
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-01-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.