Literature DB >> 6087030

Comparison of equilibrium and disequilibrium assay conditions for ergocalciferol, cholecalciferol and their major metabolites.

B W Hollis.   

Abstract

The comparison of equilibrium and disequilibrium assay conditions for ergocalciferol, cholecalciferol and their major metabolites were investigated to evaluate: (1) optimization of sensitivity (2) crossreactivity of these compounds in their respective assays and (3) side chain steric requirements of the vitamin D molecule for optimum binding to the calciferol binding protein or bovine thymus receptor. Disequilibrium assay conditions improved assay sensitivity 30-fold for the calciferol assay and approx 3-fold for metabolites in the 25-hydroxycalciferol and 1,25-dihydroxycalciferol assays. Ergocalciferol compounds were uniformly less efficient in their association with the proteins tested than were their cholecalciferol counterparts, with one exception. In the calciferol assay, cholecalciferol had greater affinity for the the calciferol binding protein than did ergocalciferol. In the 25-hydroxycalciferol assay affinity for the calciferol binding protein was 25-hydroxycholecalciferol = 24,25-dihydroxycholecalciferol greater than 25-hydroxyergocalciferol greater than 25S,26-dihydroxycholecalciferol greater than 24,25-dihydroxyergocalciferol greater than 25,26-dihydroxyergocalciferol. In the assay for 1,25-dihydroxycalciferol, bovine thymus receptor recognized 1,25-dihydroxyergocalciferol and 1,25-dihydroxycholecalciferol equally. From the forthcoming data it appears that hydroxyl and/or methyl groups on the calciferol side chain alter the ability of these physiological compounds to associate with the calciferol binding protein.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6087030     DOI: 10.1016/0022-4731(84)90063-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Steroid Biochem        ISSN: 0022-4731            Impact factor:   4.292


  50 in total

1.  Response of jejunal phosphate absorption to 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D(3) stimulationin vivo in young X-linked hypophosphatemic (Hyp) mice.

Authors:  R A Meyer; M H Meyer; R W Gray; B A Brault
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 3.633

2.  Differential Responses to Vitamin D2 and Vitamin D3 Are Associated With Variations in Free 25-Hydroxyvitamin D.

Authors:  Rene F Chun; Ivan Hernandez; Renata Pereira; Leon Swinkles; Tonnie Huijs; Rui Zhou; Nancy Q Liu; Albert Shieh; Miriam Guemes; Sanjay M Mallya; John S Adams; Martin Hewison
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 4.736

Review 3.  Clinical review: The role of the parent compound vitamin D with respect to metabolism and function: Why clinical dose intervals can affect clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Bruce W Hollis; Carol L Wagner
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 5.958

Review 4.  Current Controversies: Are Free Vitamin Metabolite Levels a More Accurate Assessment of Vitamin D Status than Total Levels?

Authors:  Daniel D Bikle; Sofie Malmstroem; Janice Schwartz
Journal:  Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 4.741

Review 5.  Vitamin D administration during pregnancy as prevention for pregnancy, neonatal and postnatal complications.

Authors:  Carol L Wagner; Bruce W Hollis; Kalliopi Kotsa; Hana Fakhoury; Spyridon N Karras
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 6.514

6.  Free versus total serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D in a murine model of colitis.

Authors:  D P Larner; C Jenkinson; R F Chun; C S J Westgate; J S Adams; M Hewison
Journal:  J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 4.292

Review 7.  Vitamin D metabolism, mechanism of action, and clinical applications.

Authors:  Daniel D Bikle
Journal:  Chem Biol       Date:  2014-02-13

8.  Effects of High-Dose Vitamin D2 Versus D3 on Total and Free 25-Hydroxyvitamin D and Markers of Calcium Balance.

Authors:  Albert Shieh; Rene F Chun; Christina Ma; Sten Witzel; Briana Meyer; Brandon Rafison; Leon Swinkels; Tonnie Huijs; Sam Pepkowitz; Brett Holmquist; Martin Hewison; John S Adams
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 5.958

Review 9.  Vitamin D in cutaneous carcinogenesis: part I.

Authors:  Jean Y Tang; Teresa Fu; Christopher Lau; Dennis H Oh; Daniel D Bikle; Maryam M Asgari
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 11.527

10.  Circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin d levels in fully breastfed infants on oral vitamin d supplementation.

Authors:  Carol L Wagner; Cindy Howard; Thomas C Hulsey; Ruth A Lawrence; Sarah N Taylor; Heather Will; Myla Ebeling; Jay Hutson; Bruce W Hollis
Journal:  Int J Endocrinol       Date:  2009-12-09       Impact factor: 3.257

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.