Literature DB >> 6036536

The esophageal propulsive force: esophageal response to acute obstruction.

D H Winship, F F Zboralske.   

Abstract

The response of the normal human esophagus to an obstructing intraluminal bolus was investigated and compared to the response evoked by transient intraluminal distention. A balloon, immobilized within the esophagus by external attachment to a force transducer, was inflated with from 3 to 25 ml of air for from 3 to 210 sec. Pressure phenomena occurring in the esophagus were simultaneously recorded from the body of the esophagus above and below the balloon. Transient distention (5 sec or less) with small volumes (5 ml or less) often evoked a secondary peristaltic wave in the esophagus distal to the balloon, but infrequently resulted in the registration of any force exerted upon the balloon to drive it downward. Conversely, distentions of longer duration and with greater volume elicited an esophageal propulsive force exerted upon the balloon oriented to propel it aborally, and much less often evoked a propagated wave of secondary peristalsis. The propulsive force, obviously resulting from esophageal muscular contraction, occurred promptly, and once initiated, was sustained until deflation of the balloon. It varied widely in magnitude, from 4 to 200 g, and was associated with no motor phenomena recorded from the body of the esophagus proximal or distal to the balloon which could account for its presence, onset, magnitude, or duration. The force was inhibited by deglutition, but arrival of the primary peristaltic wave at the bolus resulted in augmentation of the force. When the obstructing balloon was freed from its attachment, the persistent, stationary force was converted to a propagated one that propelled the balloon before it. It the balloon was arrested before entering the stomach, the moving contraction was also arrested and the persistent propulsive force acting upon the balloon was maintained. The velocity of the moving contraction wave was determined in great part by the resistance offered by the bolus. Unrestrained, the balloon was propelled aborally at 4-8 cm/sec by the esophageal propulsive force; when restrained by 50 g, the rate of passage was reduced to 0.2-0.8 cm/sec. The esophageal response to intraluminal distention is thus not limited to the uninterrupted wave of secondary peristalsis but is versatile and is determined by the nature of the distending bolus. Transient distention by a mobile or collapsible bolus elicits the propagated secondary peristaltic wave.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1967        PMID: 6036536      PMCID: PMC292885          DOI: 10.1172/JCI105631

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Invest        ISSN: 0021-9738            Impact factor:   14.808


  5 in total

1.  Esophageal motility.

Authors:  F J INGELFINGER
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  1958-10       Impact factor: 37.312

2.  The characteristics and similarity of primary and secondary peristalis in the esophagus.

Authors:  B FLESHLER; T R HENDRIX; P KRAMER; F J INGELFINGER
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1959-01-01       Impact factor: 14.808

3.  Motor responses of the esophagus to distention.

Authors:  B CREAMER; J SCHLEGEL
Journal:  J Appl Physiol       Date:  1957-05       Impact factor: 3.531

4.  Mechanism of transportation of the content of the esophagus.

Authors:  K HWANG
Journal:  J Appl Physiol       Date:  1954-06       Impact factor: 3.531

5.  The movements and innervation of the small intestine.

Authors:  W M Bayliss; E H Starling
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1899-05-11       Impact factor: 5.182

  5 in total
  13 in total

1.  Quantitative differences between primary and secondary peristaltic contractions of the esophagus.

Authors:  Donghua Liao; Anne Lund Krarup; Flemming Holbæk Lundager; Asbjørn Mohr Drewes; Hans Gregersen
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Clearance mechanisms of the aperistaltic oesophagus: the "pump gun" hypothesis.

Authors:  R Tutuian; D Pohl; D O Castell; M Fried
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2005-12-14       Impact factor: 23.059

3.  Modulation of esophageal peristalsis by alterations of body position. Effect of bolus viscosity.

Authors:  C P Dooley; B Schlossmacher; J E Valenzuela
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Movement of the feline esophagus associated with respiration and peristalsis. An evaluation using tantalum markers.

Authors:  W J Dodds; E T Stewart; D Hodges; F F Zboralske
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1973-01       Impact factor: 14.808

5.  Stimulation and characteristics of secondary oesophageal peristalsis in normal subjects.

Authors:  M N Schoeman; R H Holloway
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 23.059

6.  Site and mechanism of pain perception with oesophageal balloon distension and intravenous edrophonium in patients with oesophageal chest pain.

Authors:  J S de Caestecker; A Pryde; R C Heading
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 7.  Axial force measurement for esophageal function testing.

Authors:  Flemming H Gravesen; Peter Funch-Jensen; Hans Gregersen; Asbjørn Mohr Drewes
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-01-14       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Intraluminal force transducer measurements of human oesophageal peristalsis.

Authors:  C E Pope; P F Horton
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1972-06       Impact factor: 23.059

9.  Integrity and characteristics of secondary oesophageal peristalsis in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  M N Schoeman; R H Holloway
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 23.059

10.  Repetitive contractions of the upper esophageal body and sphincter in achalasia.

Authors:  Z G Zhang; N E Diamant
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 3.438

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.