Literature DB >> 58963

Comparison of swine vesicular disease virus and Coxsackie B5 virus by serological and RNA hybridization methods.

F Brown, T F Wild, L W Rowe, B O Underwood, T J Harris.   

Abstract

The relatedness of swine vesicular disease virus (SVDV) and Coxsackie B5 virus has been studied by virus neutralization and immunodiffusion tests and by hybridization of the virus RNAs. Clearly defined differences between the two viruses were found by the three methods. Isolates of SVDV from several countries were very closely related but could be differentiated. Recent isolates of Coxsackie B5 virus also appeared to be similar but clear differences could be detected between these and the prototype (Faulkner) strain of the virus. The SVDV isolates were more closely related to the Faulkner strain than to the recent isolates of Coxsackie B5 virus. Perhaps of more importance, the Faulkner strain was more closely related to SVDV than it was to the recent Coxsackie B5 isolates. The significance of these observations in relation to the recent emergence of swine vesicular disease is discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1976        PMID: 58963     DOI: 10.1099/0022-1317-31-2-231

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Virol        ISSN: 0022-1317            Impact factor:   3.891


  8 in total

1.  Mapping the genetic determinants of pathogenicity and plaque phenotype in swine vesicular disease virus.

Authors:  T Kanno; D Mackay; T Inoue; G Wilsden; M Yamakawa; R Yamazoe; S Yamaguchi; J Shirai; P Kitching; Y Murakami
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 5.103

2.  Comparison of genomic homologies in the coxsackievirus B group by use of cDNA:RNA dot-blot hybridization.

Authors:  S Tracy
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Comparison of capsid polypeptides of group B coxsackie-viruses and polypeptide synthesis in infected cells.

Authors:  N K Chatterjee; C Tuchowski
Journal:  Arch Virol       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 2.574

4.  Isolation and characterization of a membrane-bound population of group B coxsackieviruses.

Authors:  N K Chatterjee; W A Samsonoff; C Tuchowski
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 5.103

5.  Molecular approach to the epidemiology of swine vesicular disease: correlation of variation in the virus structural polypeptides with serological properties.

Authors:  T J Harris; B O Underwood; N J Knowles; J R Crowther; F Brown
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1979-06       Impact factor: 3.441

6.  Classification of porcine enteroviruses by antigenic analysis and cytopathic effects in tissue culture: description of 3 new serotypes.

Authors:  N J Knowles; L S Buckley; H G Pereira
Journal:  Arch Virol       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 2.574

7.  A comparative electrophoretic examination of swine vesicular disease virus and Coxsackie B5 virus.

Authors:  K J Sorensen
Journal:  Arch Virol       Date:  1977       Impact factor: 2.574

8.  Swine vesicular disease: pathways of infection.

Authors:  J A Mann; G H Hutchings
Journal:  J Hyg (Lond)       Date:  1980-06
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.