Literature DB >> 193464

A comparative electrophoretic examination of swine vesicular disease virus and Coxsackie B5 virus.

K J Sorensen.   

Abstract

Purified suspensions of Coxsackie B5 virus and swine vesicular disease virus (SVDV) were prepared by harvesting and purifying cell pack virus. Crossed immunoelectrophoresis was carried out with purified N and H antigen fractions (full and empty particles). Relative migration velocity (RMV) was calculated for the N antigen fraction of 3 SVD viruses (UKG72, HK71 and Italy 66) and 2 Coxsackie B5 viruses (Faulkner and 8068). The prototype strain of Coxsackie B5 virus (Faulkner) had a low RMV almost identical to that of the first isolated strain of SVDV, Italy 66. A recent isolate of Coxsackie B5 virus (8068, isolated in UK in 1973) had a relatively high RMV very close to that of the UKG72 strain of SVDV isolated in the UK in 1972. Also the Hong Kong strain of SVDV (HK71) had a high RMV value. These observations are considered in relation to the emergence of swine vesicular disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1977        PMID: 193464     DOI: 10.1007/bf01314667

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Virol        ISSN: 0304-8608            Impact factor:   2.574


  11 in total

1.  Correlation of polypeptide composition with antigenic variation in the swine vesicular disease and coxsackie B5 viruses.

Authors:  T J Harris; F Brown
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1975-12-25       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Serological relationship of swine vesicular disease virus and Coxsackie B5 virus.

Authors:  J H Graves
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1973-10-12       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Differentiation of a vesicular disease of pigs in Hong Kong from foot-and-mouth disease.

Authors:  G N Mowat; J H Darbyshire; J F Huntley
Journal:  Vet Rec       Date:  1972-05-27       Impact factor: 2.695

4.  A foot and mouth disease syndrome in pigs caused by an enterovirus.

Authors:  L Nardelli; E Lodetti; G L Gualandi; R Burrows; D Goodridge; F Brown; B Cartwright
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1968-09-21       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Variation in the coxsackievirus type B5 and its possible role in the etiology of swine vesicular disease.

Authors:  F Brown; F Wild
Journal:  Intervirology       Date:  1974       Impact factor: 1.763

6.  Antigenic differences between isolates of swine vesicular disease virus and their relationship to Coxsackie B5 virus.

Authors:  F Brown; P Talbot; R Burrows
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1973-10-12       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Brain and spinal cord lesions in pigs inoculated with swine vesicular disease (UKG strain) virus and coxsackievirus B5.

Authors:  V S Monlux; P D McKercher; J H Graves
Journal:  Am J Vet Res       Date:  1975-12       Impact factor: 1.156

8.  Comparison of swine vesicular disease virus and Coxsackie B5 virus by serological and RNA hybridization methods.

Authors:  F Brown; T F Wild; L W Rowe; B O Underwood; T J Harris
Journal:  J Gen Virol       Date:  1976-05       Impact factor: 3.891

9.  Attemps to infect pigs with Coxsackie virus type B5.

Authors:  J M Garland; J A Mann
Journal:  J Hyg (Lond)       Date:  1974-08

10.  Swine vesicular disease: comparative studies of viruses isolated from different countries.

Authors:  R Burrows; J A Mann; D Goodridge
Journal:  J Hyg (Lond)       Date:  1974-08
View more
  2 in total

1.  A comparative investigation of antibody to swine vesicular disease virus using counter immunoelectrophoresis, serum neutralization and double immunodiffusion tests.

Authors:  K J Sørensen
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 1.695

2.  A serological survey for swine vesicular disease in Denmark.

Authors:  K J Sørensen
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 1.695

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.