Literature DB >> 573312

Cutaneous masking. I. Psychophysical observations on interactions of multipoint stimuli in man.

S E Laskin, W A Spencer.   

Abstract

1. Psychophysical masking of cutaneous sensation at the locus of punctate test stimulation has been quantitatively examined with phasic mechanical and brief air-pulse stimuli using a conditioning-test stimulus paradigm. 2. Masking was maximal at the minimal interstimulus distance effective with this paradigm, varies inversely with interstimulus distance, and is demonstrable with the conditioning and test stimuli up to 10 cm apart on the forearm. 3. The degree of masking was found to be a direct function of the relative intensity of the conditioning stimulus with respect to the test stimulus. 4. Variations in the interstimulus interval permitted an investigation of the temporal features of cutaneous masking. It was detectable from 10 ms before to 70 ms after conditioning stimulation. Maximum masking occurred when the test stimulus was delivered about 10 ms following conditioning stimulus onset. 5. We also noted the much less marked, but still significant, enhancement phenomenon, in which weak conditioning stimuli, at just-threshold intensity levels, lowered the detection threshold for sensation at the test stimulus locus. We found this enhancement of sensation to have the same spatial distribution as did masking, but a much reduced time course. It began with the test stimulus presented simultaneously with the conditioning stimulus, peaked with 10--15 ms interstimulus intervals, but decayed in less than 40 ms. 6. Since psychophysical experiments often form the framework for the understanding of physiologic processes, it is suggested that these behavioral determinations of enhancement and masking may be correlated with the electrophysiologic properties of excitation and inhibition in neurons of the major primary somatic pathways of the central nervous system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1979        PMID: 573312     DOI: 10.1152/jn.1979.42.4.1048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  16 in total

1.  Viewing the body modulates tactile receptive fields.

Authors:  Patrick Haggard; Anastasia Christakou; Andrea Serino
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-05-17       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Effects of adaptation on the capacity to differentiate simultaneously delivered dual-site vibrotactile stimuli.

Authors:  V Tannan; S Simons; R G Dennis; M Tommerdahl
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2007-10-22       Impact factor: 3.252

3.  Early integration of bilateral touch in the primary somatosensory cortex.

Authors:  Luigi Tamè; Francesco Pavani; Christos Papadelis; Alessandro Farnè; Christoph Braun
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Gating of tactile input from the hand. I. Effects of finger movement.

Authors:  R F Schmidt; W J Schady; H E Torebjörk
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Two-point tactile discrimination ability is influenced by temporal features of stimulation.

Authors:  Robert Boldt; Juha Gogulski; Jessica Gúzman-Lopéz; Synnöve Carlson; Antti Pertovaara
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Tactile frequency discrimination is enhanced by circumventing neocortical adaptation.

Authors:  Simon Musall; Wolfger von der Behrens; Johannes M Mayrhofer; Bruno Weber; Fritjof Helmchen; Florent Haiss
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2014-09-21       Impact factor: 24.884

7.  The movement-induced modulation in discriminability between cutaneous nonpainful stimuli depends on test stimulus intensity.

Authors:  A Pertovaara; R R Helminen; H Mansikka
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Responses of areas 3b and 1 in anesthetized squirrel monkeys to single- and dual-site stimulation of the digits.

Authors:  Robert M Friedman; Li Min Chen; Anna W Roe
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Prepulse inhibition of the Tritonia escape swim.

Authors:  D L Mongeluzi; T A Hoppe; W N Frost
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1998-10-15       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Perceptual metrics of individuals with autism provide evidence for disinhibition.

Authors:  Vinay Tannan; Jameson K Holden; Zheng Zhang; Grace T Baranek; Mark A Tommerdahl
Journal:  Autism Res       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 5.216

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.