Literature DB >> 17508208

Viewing the body modulates tactile receptive fields.

Patrick Haggard1, Anastasia Christakou, Andrea Serino.   

Abstract

Tactile discrimination performance depends on the receptive field (RF) size of somatosensory cortical (SI) neurons. Psychophysical masking effects can reveal the RF of an idealized "virtual" somatosensory neuron. Previous studies show that top-down factors strongly affect tactile discrimination performance. Here, we show that non-informative vision of the touched body part influences tactile discrimination by modulating tactile RFs. Ten subjects performed spatial discrimination between touch locations on the forearm. Performance was improved when subjects saw their forearm compared to viewing a neutral object in the same location. The extent of visual information was relevant, since restricted view of the forearm did not have this enhancing effect. Vibrotactile maskers were placed symmetrically on either side of the tactile target locations, at two different distances. Overall, masking significantly impaired discrimination performance, but the spatial gradient of masking depended on what subjects viewed. Viewing the body reduced the effect of distant maskers, but enhanced the effect of close maskers, as compared to viewing a neutral object. We propose that viewing the body improves functional touch by sharpening tactile RFs in an early somatosensory map. Top-down modulation of lateral inhibition could underlie these effects.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17508208     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-007-0971-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  27 in total

Review 1.  Crossmodal links in endogenous and exogenous spatial attention: evidence from event-related brain potential studies.

Authors:  M Eimer; J Driver
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 8.989

2.  Visual enhancement of touch in spatial body representation.

Authors:  Clare Press; Marisa Taylor-Clarke; Steffan Kennett; Patrick Haggard
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-09-18       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  From innervation density to tactile acuity: 1. Spatial representation.

Authors:  Paul B Brown; H Richard Koerber; Ronald Millecchia
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2004-06-11       Impact factor: 3.252

Review 4.  Thalamocortical specificity and the synthesis of sensory cortical receptive fields.

Authors:  Jose-Manuel Alonso; Harvey A Swadlow
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Neural basis of embodiment: distinct contributions of temporoparietal junction and extrastriate body area.

Authors:  Shahar Arzy; Gregor Thut; Christine Mohr; Christoph M Michel; Olaf Blanke
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-08-02       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Structure of receptive fields in area 3b of primary somatosensory cortex in the alert monkey.

Authors:  J J DiCarlo; K O Johnson; S S Hsiao
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1998-04-01       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Interference in localizing tactile stimuli.

Authors:  J C Craig
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1989-04

Review 8.  The reorganization of somatosensory cortex following peripheral nerve damage in adult and developing mammals.

Authors:  J H Kaas; M M Merzenich; H P Killackey
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 12.449

9.  Cutaneous masking. II. Geometry of excitatory andinhibitory receptive fields of single units in somatosensory cortex of the cat.

Authors:  S E Laskin; W A Spencer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1979-07       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Extrastriate body area in human occipital cortex responds to the performance of motor actions.

Authors:  Serguei V Astafiev; Christine M Stanley; Gordon L Shulman; Maurizio Corbetta
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2004-04-25       Impact factor: 24.884

View more
  33 in total

1.  Monkey primary somatosensory cortical activity during the early reaction time period differs with cues that guide movements.

Authors:  Yu Liu; John M Denton; Randall J Nelson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-02-21       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The recalibration of tactile perception during tool use is body-part specific.

Authors:  Luke E Miller; Andrew Cawley-Bennett; Matthew R Longo; Ayse P Saygin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  That's not quite me: limb ownership encoding in the brain.

Authors:  Jakub Limanowski; Felix Blankenburg
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 3.436

4.  Network activity underlying the illusory self-attribution of a dummy arm.

Authors:  Jakub Limanowski; Felix Blankenburg
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-02-24       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Adaptation aftereffects reveal that tactile distance is a basic somatosensory feature.

Authors:  Elena Calzolari; Elena Azañón; Matthew Danvers; Giuseppe Vallar; Matthew R Longo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-04-10       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Reference frames for coding touch location depend on the task.

Authors:  Lisa M Pritchett; Michael J Carnevale; Laurence R Harris
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-09-01       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Two-point tactile discrimination ability is influenced by temporal features of stimulation.

Authors:  Robert Boldt; Juha Gogulski; Jessica Gúzman-Lopéz; Synnöve Carlson; Antti Pertovaara
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Neural substrates of reliability-weighted visual-tactile multisensory integration.

Authors:  Michael S Beauchamp; Siavash Pasalar; Tony Ro
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2010-06-23

9.  When right feels left: referral of touch and ownership between the hands.

Authors:  Valeria I Petkova; H Henrik Ehrsson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-09-09       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Keeping in touch with one's self: multisensory mechanisms of self-consciousness.

Authors:  Jane E Aspell; Bigna Lenggenhager; Olaf Blanke
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-08-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.