Literature DB >> 5722426

Fixed-ratio punishment by timeout of concurrent variable-interval behavior.

J R Thomas.   

Abstract

Pigeons' responding was maintained by two concurrently available variable-interval reinforcement schedules. A fixed-ratio punishment schedule of timeout periods from the concurrent reinforcement schedules was arranged for responding during one of the variable-interval schedules. The greater the probability of a timeout after a response on the punished variable-interval schedule (the smaller the fixed ratio that produced timeout), the greater the decline in the relative punished response rates. Relative reinforcement rates remained invariant when relative response rates declined. Both behavioral contrast and induction effects were observed on the unpunished variable-interval schedule as a function of timeout punishment of the other schedule.

Mesh:

Year:  1968        PMID: 5722426      PMCID: PMC1338535          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1968.11-609

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  17 in total

1.  Concurrent performances: reinforcement interaction and response independence.

Authors:  A C CATANIA
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1963-04       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Effect of withdrawal of positive reinforcement on an extinguishing response in young children.

Authors:  D M BAER
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  1961-03

3.  Elimination of behavior of mental patients by response-produced extinction.

Authors:  W C HOLZ; N H AZRIN; T AYLLON
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1963-07       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Fixed-ratio punishment.

Authors:  N H AZRIN; W C HOLZ; D F HAKE
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1963-04       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  The effect of drugs on a fixed-ratio performance suppressed by a pre-time-out stimulus.

Authors:  C B FERSTER; J B APPEL; R A HISS
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1962-01       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Punishment of S delta responding in matching to sample by time out from positive reinforcement.

Authors:  C B FERSTER; J B APPEL
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-01       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Withdrawal of positive reinforcement as punishment.

Authors:  C B FERSTER
Journal:  Science       Date:  1957-09-13       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Potency of Conditioned Reinforcers Based on Food and on Food and Punishment.

Authors:  G S Reynolds
Journal:  Science       Date:  1963-03-01       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  A comparison of the punishing effects of response-produced shock and response-produced time out.

Authors:  D E McMillan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1967-09       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  The effects of a pre-time-out stimulus on matching-to-sample of humans.

Authors:  N B Miller; J Zimmerman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1966-09       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  On the status of knowledge for using punishment implications for treating behavior disorders.

Authors:  Dorothea C Lerman; Christina M Vorndran
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2002

2.  Timeout as a punishing stimulus in continuous and intermittent schedules.

Authors:  H B Clark; T Rowbury; A M Baer; D M Baer
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1973

3.  Molecular contingencies in schedules of intermittent punishment.

Authors:  J L Arbuckle; K A Lattal
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Human responding on random-interval schedules of response-cost punishment: the role of reduced reinforcement density.

Authors:  Cynthia J Pietras; Andrew E Brandt; Gabriel D Searcy
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Effects of lick-contingent timeout on schedule-induced polydipsia.

Authors:  R K Flory; G G Lickfett
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-01       Impact factor: 2.468

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.