Literature DB >> 5706541

Generalization and discrimination of shape orientation in the pigeon.

G H Vetter, E Hearst.   

Abstract

Pigeons learned to peck a green key on which parallelogram-shapes were projected; they then received generalization tests in which the orientation of the parallelogram was varied. Nondifferential training produced very little eventual stimulus control along the orientation dimension, but when training included S- trials (absence of the parallelogram) subjects responded consistently more to certain orientations than to others. Unlike typical results for visual generalization (e.g., line-tilt), the tilt gradients obtained for this complex stimulus were bimodal, supporting predictions on the basis of human perceptual data. However, unimodal gradients could be produced by specific discrimination training along the orientation dimension. Other forms of intradimensional training also produced relatively steep gradients, often characterized by unexpected but consistent secondary peaks. An attempt to obtain inhibitory gradients (S+: green key; S-: parallelogram on a green background) resulted in virtually zero responding all along the shape-orientation dimension; therefore, specific inhibitory control could not be evaluated. All these experiments suggest that definition of this complex stimulus dimension in terms of mere "angular orientation" is inappropriate, and alternative interpretations are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1968        PMID: 5706541      PMCID: PMC1338628          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1968.11-753

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  8 in total

1.  STIMULUS GENERALIZATION AND THE RESPONSE-REINFORCEMENT CONTINGENCY.

Authors:  E HEARST; M B KORESKO; R POPPEN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1964-09       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Effect of discrimination training on auditory generalization.

Authors:  H M JENKINS; R H HARRISON
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1960-04

3.  Generalization gradients of inhibition after different amounts of training.

Authors:  G W Farthing; E Hearst
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-11       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Contrast, generalization, and the process of discrimination.

Authors:  G S REYNOLDS
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-10       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Dimensions of similarity.

Authors:  F ATTNEAVE
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1950-10

6.  Postdiscrimination generalization in human subjects of two different ages.

Authors:  J S Landau
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1968-04

7.  Visual discrimination of orientation by pigeons.

Authors:  H P Zeigler; S Schmerler
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1965-10       Impact factor: 2.844

8.  Investigations of a mirror-image transfer effect in pigeons.

Authors:  D R Thomas; W Klipec; J Lyons
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1966-09       Impact factor: 2.468

  8 in total
  2 in total

1.  Inhibition and the stimulus control of operant behavior.

Authors:  E Hearst; S Besley; G W Farthing
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-11       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 2.  The role of observing and attention in establishing stimulus control.

Authors:  J A Dinsmoor
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 2.468

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.