Literature DB >> 5691987

Cell to cell interaction in the immune response. 3. Chromosomal marker analysis of single antibody-forming cells in reconstituted, irradiated, or thymectomized mice.

G J Nossal, A Cunningham, G F Mitchell, J F Miller.   

Abstract

Two new methods are described for making chromosomal spreads of single antibody-forming cells. The first depends on the controlled rupture of cells in small microdroplets through the use of a mild detergent and application of a mechanical stress on the cell. The second is a microadaptation of the conventional Ford technique. Both methods have a success rate of over 50%, though the quality of chromosomal spreads obtained is generally not as good as with conventional methods. These techniques have been applied to an analysis of cell to cell interaction in adoptive immune responses, using the full syngeneic transfer system provided by the use of CBA and CBA/T6T6 donor-recipient combinations. When neonatally thymectomized mice were restored to adequate immune responsiveness to sheep erythrocytes by injections of either thymus cells or thoracic duct lymphocytes, it was shown that all the actual dividing antibody-forming cells were not of donor but of host origin. When lethally irradiated mice were injected with chromosomally marked but syngeneic mixtures of thymus and bone marrow cells, a rather feeble adoptive immune response ensued; all the antibody-forming cells identified were of bone marrow origin. When mixtures of bone marrow cells and thoracic duct lymphocytes were used, immune restoration was much more effective, and over three-quarters of the antibody-forming mitotic figures carried the bone marrow donor chromosomal marker. The results were deemed to be consistent with the conclusions derived in the previous paper of this series, namely that thymus contains some, but a small number only of antigen-reactive cells (ARC), bone marrow contains antibody-forming cell precursors (AFCP) but no ARC, and thoracic duct lymph contains both ARC and AFCP with a probable predominance of the former. A vigorous immune response to sheep erythrocytes probably requires a collaboration between the two cell lineages, involving proliferation first of the ARC and then of the AFCP. The results stressed that the use of large numbers of pure thoracic duct lymphocytes in adoptive transfer work could lead to good adoptive immune responses, but that such results should not be construed as evidence against cell collaboration hypotheses. Some possible further uses of single cell chromosome techniques were briefly discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1968        PMID: 5691987      PMCID: PMC2138549          DOI: 10.1084/jem.128.4.839

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Med        ISSN: 0022-1007            Impact factor:   14.307


  8 in total

1.  ANTIGENS IN IMMUNITY. I. PREPARATION AND PROPERTIES OF FLAGELLAR ANTIGENS FROM SALMONELLA ADELAIDE.

Authors:  G L ADA; G J NOSSAL; J PYE; A ABBOT
Journal:  Aust J Exp Biol Med Sci       Date:  1964-06

2.  Observations on the mechanism of secretion of gamma-globulins by isolated lymph node cells.

Authors:  E HELMREICH; M KERN; H N EISEN
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1962-06       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  DNA synthesis in the development of antibody-forming cells during the early stages of the immune response.

Authors:  A Szenberg; A J Cunningham
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1968-02-24       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  "Intrinsic" immunological tolerance in allophenic mice.

Authors:  B Mintz; W K Silvers
Journal:  Science       Date:  1967-12-15       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Autoradiographic studies on the immune response. II. DNA synthesis amongst single antibody-producing cells.

Authors:  O MAKELA; G J NOSSAL
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1962-01-01       Impact factor: 14.307

6.  Cell to cell interaction in the immune response. II. The source of hemolysin-forming cells in irradiated mice given bone marrow and thymus or thoracic duct lymphocytes.

Authors:  G F Mitchell; J F Miller
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1968-10-01       Impact factor: 14.307

7.  Cell to cell interaction in the immune response. I. Hemolysin-forming cells in neonatally thymectomized mice reconstituted with thymus or thoracic duct lymphocytes.

Authors:  J F Miller; G F Mitchell
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1968-10-01       Impact factor: 14.307

8.  Antibody formation by single cells from lymph nodes and efferent lymph of sheep.

Authors:  A J Cunningham; J B Smith; E H Mercer
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1966-10-01       Impact factor: 14.307

  8 in total
  65 in total

1.  The evolution of innate lymphoid cells.

Authors:  Eric Vivier; Serge A van de Pavert; Max D Cooper; Gabrielle T Belz
Journal:  Nat Immunol       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 25.606

2.  Difference in the target cells for tolerance induction in relation to the dose of tolerogen.

Authors:  Y Katsura; S Kawaguchi; S Muramatsu
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  1972-10       Impact factor: 7.397

3.  Differing effects of dietary protein deprivation on the production of rosette-forming cells in the lymph nodes and the spleen and on the levels of serum haemagglutinins in rats immunized to sheep red cells.

Authors:  A Aschkenasy
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  1973-04       Impact factor: 7.397

4.  A factor that can be used to regulate an in vitro primary immune response.

Authors:  J Watson; M Thoman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1972-03       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Genetic control of the immune response. 3. The participation of bone marrow and thymus cells and the effect of endotoxin on the antibody formation to haptens in well and poorly responding strains of mice.

Authors:  B Ríhová-Skárová; I Ríha
Journal:  Folia Microbiol (Praha)       Date:  1972       Impact factor: 2.099

Review 6.  Cell cooperation in the immune response.

Authors:  J H Playfair
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  1971-06       Impact factor: 4.330

7.  Immune responses in aged mice: changes of antibody-forming cell precursors and antigen-reactive cells with ageing.

Authors:  S Kishimoto; Y Yamamura
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  1971-06       Impact factor: 4.330

8.  Contact and delayed hypersensitivity in the mouse. II. The role of different cell populations.

Authors:  W Ptak; G L Asherson
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  1969-11       Impact factor: 7.397

9.  Studies on the cellular basis of IgM immunological memory. The induction of antibody formation in bone marrow cells by primed spleen cells.

Authors:  A J Cunningham
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  1969-12       Impact factor: 7.397

10.  Responses to immunization in the thymus of the adult mouse.

Authors:  E P Cohen; J Majer; K Friedman
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1969-11-01       Impact factor: 14.307

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.