Literature DB >> 3300578

Comparison of intraoperative ultrasonography and cholangiography in detection of small common bile duct stones.

R Chardavoyne, S Kumari-Subhaya, L J Auguste, G Phillips, T A Stein, L Wise.   

Abstract

High-resolution intraoperative ultrasonography was compared with conventional radiographic imaging in the detection of small common bile duct (CBD) stones (less than 5 mm in diameter). Sixteen mongrel dogs had laparotomy and ligation of distal CBD; 1 week to 10 days later, 0-3 gallstones of varying sizes (2-5 mm) were introduced into the dilated CBD (6-16 mm). High-resolution intraoperative ultrasonography of the CBD and a conventional intraoperative cholangiogram were performed to detect the presence and number of stones. The results of these two tests were evaluated independently by two ultrasonographers and two surgeons. There were 21 true-positive and five false-negative readings by sonogram compared with 17 and 9, respectively, by cholangiogram. Sensitivity of the sonogram was 81% and 65.4% by cholangiogram. Score of accuracy was 1.06 and 1.62 by cholangiogram and 0.81 and 0.87 by ultrasound (p less than 0.05). Intraoperative ultrasonography was found to be more sensitive in detecting small CBD stones when compared with intraoperative cholangiogram.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3300578      PMCID: PMC1492928          DOI: 10.1097/00000658-198707000-00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  19 in total

1.  OPERATIVE CHOLANGIOGRAPHY AS AN AID IN REDUCING THE INCIDENCE OF "OVERLOOKED" COMMON BILE DUCT STONES: A STUDY OF 1,293 CHOLEDOCHOLITHOTOMIES.

Authors:  N F HICKEN; A J MCALLISTER
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1964-06       Impact factor: 3.982

2.  Operating room cholangiography.

Authors:  W H MEHN
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  1954-02       Impact factor: 2.741

3.  Routine operative cholangiography: an evaluation.

Authors:  L I NIENHUIS
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1961-12       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Comparative accuracy of operative ultrasonography and cholangiography in detecting common duct calculi.

Authors:  B Sigel; J Machi; J C Beitler; P E Donahue; C T Bombeck; R J Baker; B Duarte
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 3.982

5.  The misdiagnosis of common bile duct stones with ultrasound.

Authors:  K C Dewbury; C L Smith
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Comparison of cholangiography and ultrasonography in the operative screening of the common bile duct.

Authors:  B Sigel; J C Coelho; L M Nyhus; P E Donahue; J M Velasco; D G Spigos
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Ultrasonic indications to explore the common bile duct.

Authors:  R J Lane; G A Coupland
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 3.982

Review 8.  Prevention and management of retained bile duct stones.

Authors:  D H Birkett; L F Williams
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  1981-08       Impact factor: 2.741

9.  Real-time ultrasonography during biliary surgery.

Authors:  B Sigel; J C Coelho; D G Spigos; P E Donahue; S A Renigers; V Capek; L M Nyhus; G L Popky
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Intra-operative B-mode ultrasound scanning of the extra-hepatic biliary system and pancreas.

Authors:  R J Lane; G Glazer
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1980-08-16       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  2 in total

1.  Transcholecystic operative cholangiography: an alternative technique: Assessor's comment.

Authors:  J P Neoptolemos
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  Routine laparoscopic ultrasonography in biliary surgery. A preliminary experience.

Authors:  R Orda; J Sayfan; Y Levy
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 4.584

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.