Literature DB >> 565815

The responses of amacrine cells to light and intracellularly applied currents.

P L Marchiafava, V Torre.   

Abstract

1. Intracellular responses to light were recorded from amacrine cells in the retina of the turtle Pseudemys scripta elegans. 2. The recorded responses were identified on the basis of physiological criteria reported previously (Marchiafava, 1976). Amacrine cells produced transient 'on' and 'off' depolarizing responses irrespective of the retinal area illuminated and of wavelength. 3. The transient depolarizing responses increased by enlarging the illuminated circle up to 120 micrometer in radius. Circles covering larger areas, up to 200 micrometer, produced a relative decrease of the response amplitude. Thus, amacrine cells' receptive fields appear as a central 'excitatory' area of about 120 micrometer radius, surrounded by a 'suppressor' area. 4. Amacrine cells' photoresponses were associated with an increase in membrane conductance. The responses to illumination of central or peripheral areas of the receptive field, however, showed different reversal potentials. The responses to peripheral illumination reversed at about 15 mV above resting potential, while the equilibrium potential of the centre-photoresponses was indicated by extrapolation at about +30 mV. No conductance chance was detectable during steady lights. 5. Repetitive stimulation of the optic nerve invariably reduced amacrine cells' photoresponses, but not those recorded from bipolar cells. It follows then that only ganglion cell photoresponses originating from amacrines' input would be depressed by the nerve stimulation, which thus becomes a reliable test to discriminate whether ganglion cell photoresponses originate from amacrine or bipolar inputs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1978        PMID: 565815      PMCID: PMC1282412          DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1978.sp012221

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  21 in total

1.  The local electric changes associated with repetitive action in a non-medullated axon.

Authors:  A L Hodgkin
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1948-03-15       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  The amacrine cell.

Authors:  R Y Chan; K Naka
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1976       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Self-facilitation of ganglion cells in the retina of the turtle.

Authors:  P L Marchiafava; V Torre
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1977-06       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Electrical responses of single cones in the retina of the turtle.

Authors:  D A Baylor; M G Fuortes
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1970-03       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Light-induced resistance changes in retinal rods and cones of the tiger salamander.

Authors:  A Lasansky; P L Marchiafava
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1974-01       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Detection and resolution of visual stimuli by turtle photoreceptors.

Authors:  D A Baylor; A L Hodgkin
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1973-10       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Receptive field organization of bipolar and amacrine cells in the goldfish retina.

Authors:  A Kaneko
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1973-11       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Identification of amacrine and ganglion cells in the carp retina.

Authors:  M Murakami; Y Shimoda
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Regenerative amacrine cell depolarization and formation of on-off ganglion cell response.

Authors:  F S Werblin
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Electrical responses of rods in the retina of Bufo marinus.

Authors:  L Cervetto; E Pasino; V Torre
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1977-05       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  14 in total

1.  Effects of remote stimulation on the mean firing rate of cat retinal ganglion cells.

Authors:  C L Passaglia; C Enroth-Cugell; J B Troy
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-08-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Modeling Starburst cells' GABA(B) receptors and their putative role in motion sensitivity.

Authors:  Norberto M Grzywacz; Charles L Zucker
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2006-04-28       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  The periphery effect in cat retinal ganglion cells: variation with functional class and eccentricity.

Authors:  D H Rapaport; J Stone
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Influence of amacrine cells on receptive field organization of ganglion cells of the generalized vertebrate cone retina: electronic simulation.

Authors:  R Siminoff
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 2.086

5.  A model for the temporal organization of X- and Y-type receptive fields in the primate retina.

Authors:  J Richter; S Ullman
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 2.086

6.  An analogue model of the luminosity-channel in the vertebrate cone retina. 3. Physiological correlates.

Authors:  R Siminoff
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 2.086

7.  The ramification pattern of amacrine cells within the inner plexiform layer of the carp retina.

Authors:  J Ammermüller; R Weiler
Journal:  Cell Tissue Res       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 5.249

8.  Dynamics of L-type bipolar and phasic amacrine cells in the vertebrate cone retina.

Authors:  R Siminoff
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 2.086

9.  Responses of rod bipolar cells in the dark-adapted retina of the dogfish, Scyliorhinus canicula.

Authors:  J F Ashmore; G Falk
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Morphological and pharmacological analysis of putative serotonergic bipolar and amacrine cells in the retina of a turtle, Pseudemys scripta elegans.

Authors:  R Weiler; M Schütte
Journal:  Cell Tissue Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 5.249

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.