Literature DB >> 4830137

Error rates in cervical cytological screening tests.

D May.   

Abstract

In an attempt to clear up the confusion evident in the literature concerning some aspects of cervical cytological screening tests, the principle is stated upon which the data acquired in a series of tests should be tabulated. The table is used to define several rates or probabilities, most of which express the rates at which errors occur. Certain rates are distinguished as of basic importance, others playing only a secondary role. The inter-relations of the rates are displayed as equations and reference is made to a set of conversion tables constructed from the equations. As an illustration, the data from a particular published paper is treated in detail, showing how the various rates can be calculated or estimated, and, in passing, also demonstrating their high degree of uncertainty.

Mesh:

Year:  1974        PMID: 4830137      PMCID: PMC2009002          DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1974.46

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


  3 in total

1.  POSITIVE CYTOLOGY REGISTRY. A 15 YEAR EXPERIENCE.

Authors:  E H COPENHAVER; D R BAHNER
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1963-08-01       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  CYTOLOGY SCREENING FOR CERVICAL CANCER IN A MUNICIPAL HOSPITAL.

Authors:  A SEDLIS; A B WEINGOLD; D H WILSEY; M L STONE
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1964-02       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  The clinical application of Bayes' theorem.

Authors:  G H Hall
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1967-09-09       Impact factor: 79.321

  3 in total
  2 in total

1.  Cervical smears.

Authors:  A I Spriggs; O A Husain
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1977-06-11

2.  The evaluation of tests.

Authors:  S W Martin
Journal:  Can J Comp Med       Date:  1977-01
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.