Literature DB >> 5547283

Some effects of punishment shock intensity upon discriminative responding.

R W Powell.   

Abstract

Three pigeons received visual discrimination training under both multiple variable-ratio extinction and variable-interval extinction schedules. All birds developed nearly perfect discrimination. When punishment for every tenth response during food reinforcement was presented, responding decreased as shock intensity increased. At the same time, responding during extinction, which was not punished, increased at intermediate punishment intensities, but returned to low levels under severe punishment. A second procedure, in which punishment and no-punishment sessions alternated unsystematically, was employed with two of the birds. The results under this procedure essentially replicated the data obtained as punishment shock intensity increased gradually.

Mesh:

Year:  1971        PMID: 5547283      PMCID: PMC1333787          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1971.15-109

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  12 in total

1.  STRESS-INDUCED BREAKDOWN OF AN APPETITIVE DISCRIMINATION.

Authors:  E HEARST
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1965-05       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Behavioral contrast.

Authors:  G S REYNOLDS
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-01       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  A technique for delivering shock to pigeons.

Authors:  N H AZRIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1959-04       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  An analysis of interactions in a multiple schedule.

Authors:  G S Reynolds
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-04       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Discrimination learning, the peak shift, and behavioral contrast.

Authors:  H S Terrace
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-11       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  The effect of punishment shock intensity upon responding under multiple schedules.

Authors:  R W Powell
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-09       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Behavioral contrast in chained schedules.

Authors:  R N Wilton; R A Gay
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-11       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Behavioral contrast with fixed interval and low-rate reinforcement.

Authors:  G S REYNOLDS; A C CATANIA
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-10       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Some effects of the conditioned suppression paradigm on operant discrimination performance.

Authors:  K M Weiss
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-11       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  On some causes of behavioral contrast.

Authors:  G S Reynolds; A J Limpo
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-09       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  On the status of knowledge for using punishment implications for treating behavior disorders.

Authors:  Dorothea C Lerman; Christina M Vorndran
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2002

2.  Molecular contingencies in schedules of intermittent punishment.

Authors:  J L Arbuckle; K A Lattal
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Preference for locus of punishment in a response sequence.

Authors:  J F Dardano
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-03       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Effects of stimulus control and deprivation upon discriminative responding.

Authors:  R W Powell
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-03       Impact factor: 2.468

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.