Literature DB >> 4706239

Effects of stimulus control and deprivation upon discriminative responding.

R W Powell.   

Abstract

Discriminative responding in pigeons was studied under multiple variable-interval extinction schedules in which extinction was correlated with either a tone or a white keylight. The two procedures resulted in weak and strong stimulus control, respectively. In the first experiment, there was no interaction between schedule components when stimulus control was strong and reinforcement was omitted under the previously reinforced component. However, there was marked induction between components when stimulus control was weak and responding was extinguished under the previously reinforced component. In the second experiment, hours of food deprivation was varied under two levels of stimulus control. Deprivation mainly influenced response rates under the extinction stimulus, with greater absolute rate increases occurring the lower the existing level of stimulus control. Increases in responding during the extinction stimulus were four times as great from 24 to 72 hours of deprivation as from 24 to 48 hours under conditions of both high and low stimulus control.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1973        PMID: 4706239      PMCID: PMC1334086          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1973.19-351

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  12 in total

1.  BEHAVIORAL CONTRAST DURING MULTIPLE AVOIDANCE SCHEDULES.

Authors:  G A WERTHEIM
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1965-09       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  A comparison of several procedures for eliminating behavior.

Authors:  W C HOLZ; N H AZRIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1963-07       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Positive interaction (induction) in multiple variable-interval, differential-reinforcement-of-high-rate schedules.

Authors:  N S Hemmes; D A Eckerman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-01       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  An analysis of interactions in a multiple schedule.

Authors:  G S Reynolds
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-04       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Discrimination learning, the peak shift, and behavioral contrast.

Authors:  H S Terrace
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-11       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Contrast and induction in rats on multiple schedules.

Authors:  J J Pear; D M Wilkie
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1971-05       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Behavioral contrast with fixed interval and low-rate reinforcement.

Authors:  G S REYNOLDS; A C CATANIA
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-10       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Evidence of interaction between deprivation effects and stimulus control.

Authors:  R W Powell
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1971-07       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Schedule-induced aggression as a function of fixed-ratio value.

Authors:  D R Cherek; R Pickens
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-11       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Some effects of punishment shock intensity upon discriminative responding.

Authors:  R W Powell
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1971-01       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  2 in total

1.  The effectiveness of and preschoolers' preferences for variations of multiple-schedule arrangements.

Authors:  Jeffrey H Tiger; Gregory P Hanley; Nicole A Heal
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2006

2.  Auditory word discriminations in the pigeon.

Authors:  R Pisacreta; D Gough; E Redwood; L Goodfellow
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 2.468

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.