Literature DB >> 528930

Coding left and right.

W S Farrell.   

Abstract

The present study compared the processing of direction for up and down arrows and for left and right arrows in visual displays. Experiment 1 demonstrated that it is more difficult to deal with left and right than with up and down when the two directions must be discriminated but not when they must simply be oriented to. Experiments 2 and 3 showed that telling left from right is harder regardless of whether the responses are manual or verbal. Experiment 4 showed that left-right discriminations take longer than up-down discriminations for judgments of position as well as direction. In Experiment 5 it was found that position information can intrude on direction judgments both within a dimension (e.g., a left arrow to the left of fixation is judged faster than a left arrow to the right of fixation) and across dimensions (e.g., judging vertically positioned left and right arrows is more difficult than judging horizontally positioned left and right arrows). There was indirect evidence in these experiments that although the spatial codes for up and down are symmetrical, the codes for left and right may be less so; this in turn could account for the greater difficulty of discriminating left from right.

Mesh:

Year:  1979        PMID: 528930     DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.5.1.42

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  17 in total

1.  Representation of Object Orientation in Children: Evidence from Mirror-Image Confusions.

Authors:  Emma Gregory; Barbara Landau; Michael McCloskey
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2011-09-01

Review 2.  Stimulus and response representations underlying orthogonal stimulus-response compatibility effects.

Authors:  Yang Seok Cho; Robert W Proctor
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-03

3.  Switching points of view in spatial mental models.

Authors:  N Franklin; B Tversky; V Coon
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1992-09

Review 4.  Spatial coding in two dimensions.

Authors:  Sandro Rubichi; Kim-Phuong L Vu; Roberto Nicoletti; Robert W Proctor
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-04

5.  Effects of visual attentional load on low-level auditory scene analysis.

Authors:  Benjamin J Dyson; Claude Alain; Yu He
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.282

6.  Remembering left-right orientation of pictures.

Authors:  J C Bartlett; M A Gernsbacher; R E Till
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Judgments of shape orientation: a matter of contrasts.

Authors:  L G Braine; E Plastow; S L Greene
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1987-04

8.  Asymmetries in processing horizontal and vertical dimensions.

Authors:  E Làdavas
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1988-07

9.  Right-left prevalence in spatial compatibility.

Authors:  R Nicoletti; C Umiltà
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1984-04

10.  Multisensory interactions follow the hands across the midline: evidence from a non-spatial visual-tactile congruency task.

Authors:  Nicholas P Holmes; Daniel Sanabria; Gemma A Calvert; Charles Spence
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2006-02-17       Impact factor: 3.252

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.