Literature DB >> 528925

Choice reaction times for temporal numerosity.

P Viviani.   

Abstract

Subjects watched rapidly presented visual sequences of two events until they decided which event was the more frequent. Accuracy was reduced both by increased rates of presentation and by the addition of more inconclusive information to the initial portion of the sequence. Response latencies were longest when there was no objective numerosity inbalance, and they decreased, for both correct responses and errors, when discrimination was relatively easy. The patterns of decision latencies for individual subjects could be represented on a continuum defined by the sensitivity of the latencies to the rate of event presentation and to the objective inbalance between the two events. The discussion points out formal and empirical similarities between sequential numerosity judgments and choice reaction times. The present results are discussed within the framework of a first-passage time model, to be developed formally in a subsequent paper.

Mesh:

Year:  1979        PMID: 528925     DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.5.1.157

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  3 in total

1.  Compatibility effects based on stimulus and response numerosity.

Authors:  Jeff Miller; Stephen G Atkins; Fenna Van Nes
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-04

2.  Comparing fixed and collapsing boundary versions of the diffusion model.

Authors:  Chelsea Voskuilen; Roger Ratcliff; Philip L Smith
Journal:  J Math Psychol       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 2.223

3.  How much time does it take to discriminate two sets by their numbers of elements?

Authors:  Jüri Allik; Aire Raidvee
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 2.199

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.