Literature DB >> 35484444

How much time does it take to discriminate two sets by their numbers of elements?

Jüri Allik1,2, Aire Raidvee3.   

Abstract

The ability to evaluate the number of elements in a set-numerosity-without symbolic representation is a form of primitive perceptual intelligence. A simple binomial model was proposed to explain how observers discriminate the numerical proportion between two sets of elements distinct in color or orientation (Raidvee et al., 2017, Attention Perception & Psychophysics, 79[1], 267-282). The binomial model's only parameter β is the probability with which each visual element can be noticed and registered by the perceptual system. Here we analyzed the response times (RT) which were ignored in the previous report since there were no instructions concerning response speed. The relationship between the mean RT and the absolute difference |ΔN| between numbers of elements in two sets was described by a linear regression, the slope of which became flatter as the total number of elements N increased. Because the coefficients of regression between the mean RT and |ΔN| were more directly related to the binomial probability β rather than to the standard deviation of the best fitting cumulative normal distribution, it was regarded as evidence that the binomial model with a single parameter - probability β - is a viable alternative to the customary Thurstonian-Gaussian model.
© 2022. The Psychonomic Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Binomial model of discrimination; Numerosity discrimination; Psychometric discrimination function; Response time; Thurstonian psychophysics

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35484444     DOI: 10.3758/s13414-022-02474-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  15 in total

1.  The neural basis of the Weber-Fechner law: a logarithmic mental number line.

Authors:  Stanislas Dehaene
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  Unfalsifiability and mutual translatability of major modeling schemes for choice reaction time.

Authors:  Matt Jones; Ehtibar N Dzhafarov
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2013-09-30       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  Separate mechanisms for perception of numerosity and density.

Authors:  Giovanni Anobile; Guido Marco Cicchini; David C Burr
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2013-11-22

4.  Discrimination of relative numerosity and stimulus mixture by pigeons with comparable tasks.

Authors:  W K Honig; W R Matheson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1995-10

Review 5.  Stimulus intensity and response evocation.

Authors:  G R Grice
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1968-09       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  A common visual metric for approximate number and density.

Authors:  Steven C Dakin; Marc S Tibber; John A Greenwood; Frederick A A Kingdom; Michael J Morgan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-11-21       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  The precision of numerosity discrimination in arrays of random dots.

Authors:  A Burgess; H B Barlow
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Individual differences in non-verbal number acuity correlate with maths achievement.

Authors:  Justin Halberda; Michèle M M Mazzocco; Lisa Feigenson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-09-07       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Numerosity representations in crows obey the Weber-Fechner law.

Authors:  Helen M Ditz; Andreas Nieder
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Mechanisms for perception of numerosity or texture-density are governed by crowding-like effects.

Authors:  Giovanni Anobile; Marco Turi; Guido Marco Cicchini; David C Burr
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.