Literature DB >> 5262684

A laminagraphic study of cuspid retraction versus molar anchorage loss.

R C Paulson, T M Speidel, R J Isaacson.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  1970        PMID： 5262684     DOI： 10.1043/0003-3219(1970)040<0020:ALSOCR>2.0.CO;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN： 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


× No keyword cloud information.
  4 in total

1.  Indirect miniscrew anchorage: biomechanical loading of the dental anchorage during mandibular molar protraction-an FEM analysis.

Authors:  Christof Holberg; Philipp Winterhalder; Nikola Holberg; Andrea Wichelhaus; Ingrid Rudzki-Janson
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  Comparison of BALP, CTX-I, and IL-4 levels around miniscrew implants during orthodontic tooth movement between two different amounts of force.

Authors:  Mine Gecgelen Cesur; V Ozgen Ozturk; Beral Afacan; F Burcu Sirin; Afra Alkan; Torun Ozer
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2019-02-07       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  Multipurpose use of orthodontic mini-implants to achieve different treatment goals.

Authors:  M Nienkemper; B Wilmes; A Pauls; D Drescher
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2012-10-28       Impact factor: 1.938

4.  Canine retraction rate with self-ligating brackets vs conventional edgewise brackets.

Authors:  S Jack Burrow
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.079
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.