Literature DB >> 5058442

Characteristics of S organism isolated from Methanobacillus omelianskii.

C A Reddy, M P Bryant, M J Wolin.   

Abstract

Previous work showed that Methanobacillus omelianskii was a mixed culture of an ethanol-oxidizing organism called S organism and a hydrogen-utilizing methane bacterium, strain MOH. S organism grows poorly on ethanol unless a hydrogen-utilizing methanogenic bacterium is included to utilize the H(2) produced during growth. Further studies have shown that, among many substrates tested, only ethanol, n-propanol, n-butanol, isobutanol, n-pentanol, acetaldehyde, oxalacetate, and pyruvate are fermented by S organism, either alone or in combination with Methanobacterium ruminantium. It grew better in pure culture with pyruvate than with alcohols. H(2) gas phase inhibited growth on pyruvate as well as on alcohol. When grown alone on pyruvate, S organism produced mainly acetate, ethanol, and CO(2), in addition to a small amount of H(2). When combined with M. ruminantium, no H(2) and very little ethanol were produced and acetate production was increased. When M. ruminantium was present, electrons from pyruvate oxidation by S organism were channeled almost entirely to H(2) and hence to methane formation rather than ethanol. Also, S organism utilized more pyruvate when grown with M. ruminantium. Attempts to obtain better growth of S organism on ethanol by addition of many possible electron acceptors were unsuccessful. It grew best between 32 and 45 C, had a per cent guanine plus cytosine content of deoxyribonucleic acid bases of 47.27 +/- 0.1, contained no cytochrome, and could be grown on a defined medium with pyruvate as the energy and carbon source and with (NH(4))(2)SO(4) as the main nitrogen source. These and other results suggest that S organism belongs in a new genus, but assignment of a definite taxonomic status should await isolation and characterization of more strains.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1972        PMID: 5058442      PMCID: PMC285174          DOI: 10.1128/jb.109.2.539-545.1972

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bacteriol        ISSN: 0021-9193            Impact factor:   3.490


  9 in total

1.  Methane formation; fermentation of ethanol in the absence of carbon dioxide by Methanobacillus omelianskii.

Authors:  A T JOHNS; H A BARKER
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1960-12       Impact factor: 3.490

2.  Isolation and characterization of Methanobacterium ruminantium n. sp.

Authors:  P H SMITH; R E HUNGATE
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1958-06       Impact factor: 3.490

3.  Pyruvate oxidation in Desulphovibrio desulphuricans.

Authors:  J C SADANA
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1954-05       Impact factor: 3.490

4.  Studies on the Methane Fermentation: VI. The Influence of Carbon Dioxide Concentration on the Rate of Carbon Dioxide Reduction by Molecular Hydrogen.

Authors:  H A Barker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1943-06       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  The anaerobic mesophilic cellulolytic bacteria.

Authors:  R E HUNGATE
Journal:  Bacteriol Rev       Date:  1950-03

6.  Methanobacillus omelianskii, a symbiotic association of two species of bacteria.

Authors:  M P Bryant; E A Wolin; M J Wolin; R S Wolfe
Journal:  Arch Mikrobiol       Date:  1967

7.  Classification of the spore-forming sulfate-reducing bacteria.

Authors:  L L Campbell; J R Postgate
Journal:  Bacteriol Rev       Date:  1965-09

8.  Hydrogen-oxidizing methane bacteria. I. Cultivation and methanogenesis.

Authors:  M P Bryant; B C McBride; R S Wolfe
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1968-03       Impact factor: 3.490

9.  Viologen dye inhibition of methane formation by Methanobacillus omelianskii.

Authors:  E A Wolin; R S Wolfe; M J Wolin
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1964-05       Impact factor: 3.490

  9 in total
  24 in total

1.  Comparison of diffusion and reaction rates in anaerobic microbial aggregates.

Authors:  S Goodwin; E Giraldo-Gomez; B Mobarry; M S Switzenbaum
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 4.552

2.  Growth of desulfovibrio in lactate or ethanol media low in sulfate in association with H2-utilizing methanogenic bacteria.

Authors:  M P Bryant; L L Campbell; C A Reddy; M R Crabill
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1977-05       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Growth of methanogenic bacteria in pure culture with 2-propanol and other alcohols as hydrogen donors.

Authors:  F Widdel
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Homoacetogenic Fermentation of Cellulose by a Coculture of Clostridium thermocellum and Acetogenium kivui.

Authors:  P Le Ruyet; H C Dubourguier; G Albagnac
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Sulfate-Dependent Interspecies H(2) Transfer between Methanosarcina barkeri and Desulfovibrio vulgaris during Coculture Metabolism of Acetate or Methanol.

Authors:  T J Phelps; R Conrad; J G Zeikus
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Syntrophomonas wolfei gen. nov. sp. nov., an Anaerobic, Syntrophic, Fatty Acid-Oxidizing Bacterium.

Authors:  M J McInerney; M P Bryant; R B Hespell; J W Costerton
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1981-04       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Kinetic parameters of the conversion of methane precursors to methane in a hypereutrophic lake sediment.

Authors:  R F Strayer; J M Tiedje
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1978-08       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Energy conservation in chemotrophic anaerobic bacteria.

Authors:  R K Thauer; K Jungermann; K Decker
Journal:  Bacteriol Rev       Date:  1977-03

9.  H2 production by Selenomonas ruminantium in the absence and presence of methanogenic bacteria.

Authors:  C C Scheifinger; B Linehan; M J Wolin
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1975-04

10.  Methane formation and methane oxidation by methanogenic bacteria.

Authors:  A J Zehnder; T D Brock
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1979-01       Impact factor: 3.490

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.