Literature DB >> 5022178

Allogeneic and xenogeneic response in mixed leukocyte cultures.

M B Widmer, F H Bach.   

Abstract

The mixed lymphocyte culture (MLC) test has been regarded as an in vitro model of the recognition or sensitization phase of the homograft or graft-versus-host reaction. It has been suggested that the graft-versus-host response in vivo is less in xenogeneic combinations than in allogeneic ones and that there is a similar quantitative relationship in MLC responses. Given the above interpretation of the MLC test, this could suggest that the lesser reactivity in xenogeneic combinations may be due to a lesser recognition of the stimulus. We have done nine experiments testing allogeneic and xenogeneic combinations in MLC, largely in combinatorial fashion. The results indicate that the response in xenogeneic MLC may be as great as that in allogeneic MLC and that, as in different allogeneic mixtures, there is great variation in the extent to which xenogeneic mixtures may respond.

Mesh:

Year:  1972        PMID: 5022178      PMCID: PMC2138977          DOI: 10.1084/jem.135.5.1204

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Med        ISSN: 0022-1007            Impact factor:   14.307


  10 in total

1.  Three closely linked genetic systems relevant to transplantation.

Authors:  E J Yunis; D B Amos
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1971-12       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Transplantation: pairing of donor and recipient.

Authors:  F H Bach
Journal:  Science       Date:  1970-06-05       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Reactions of the graft versus host (GVH) type.

Authors:  K J Lafferty; M A Jones
Journal:  Aust J Exp Biol Med Sci       Date:  1969-02

4.  Mixed lymphocyte cultures produce effector cells: model in vitro for allograft rejection.

Authors:  P Häyry; V Defendi
Journal:  Science       Date:  1970-04-03       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Cytotoxicity: specificity after in vitro sensitization.

Authors:  S Solliday; F H Bach
Journal:  Science       Date:  1970-12-25       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Histocompatibility matching. VI. Miniaturization of the mixed leukocyte culture test: a preliminary report.

Authors:  R J Hartzman; M Segall; M L Bach; F H Bach
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1971-03       Impact factor: 4.939

7.  Quantitative studies on the mixed lymphocyte interaction in rats. 3. Kinetics of the response.

Authors:  D B Wilson; P C Blyth JL NOWELL
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1968-11-01       Impact factor: 14.307

8.  Quantitative studies on the mixed lymphocyte interaction in rats. VI. Reactivity of lymphocytes from conventional and germfree rats to allogeneic and xenogeneic cell surface antigens.

Authors:  D B Wilson; D H Fox
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1971-10-01       Impact factor: 14.307

9.  Quantitative studies on the mixed lymphocyte interaction in rats. IV. Immunologic potentiality of the responding cells.

Authors:  D B Wilson; P C Nowell
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1970-02       Impact factor: 14.307

10.  Phenotypic expressions of the major histocompatibility locus in man (HL-A): leukocyte antigens and mixed leukocyte culture reactivity.

Authors:  D B Amos; F H Bach
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1968-10-01       Impact factor: 14.307

  10 in total
  15 in total

1.  Demonstration of direct xenorecognition of porcine cells by human cytotoxic T lymphocytes.

Authors:  A C Cunningham; T J Butler; J A Kirby
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 7.397

2.  Effect of polyclonal and monoclonal HLA-DR xenoantibodies on xenogeneic mixed lymphocyte reactions.

Authors:  C Russo; V Quaranta; F Indiveri; M A Pellegrino; S Ferrone
Journal:  Immunogenetics       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 2.846

3.  A serological investigation into the acidic alpha-D-mannosidase in normal Angus cattle and in a calf with mannosidosis.

Authors:  N C Phillips; B G Winchester
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1977-05-01       Impact factor: 3.857

4.  Selective depression of the xenogeneic cell-mediated lympholysis in systemic lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  B Charpentier; C Carnaud; J F Bach
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1979-08       Impact factor: 14.808

5.  Xenogeneic proliferation and lymphokine production are dependent on CD4+ helper T cells and self antigen-presenting cells in the mouse.

Authors:  R D Moses; R N Pierson; H J Winn; H Auchincloss
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1990-08-01       Impact factor: 14.307

6.  Immune responsiveness against the human placenta. II. Response with xenogeneic lymphocytes in culture.

Authors:  M Davies; M E McLaughlin; R G Sutcliffe
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  1982-11       Impact factor: 7.397

7.  Genetic control of cell-mediated lympholysis in mouse.

Authors:  D J Schendel; F H Bach
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1974-12-01       Impact factor: 14.307

8.  Responsiveness of germfree mice in mixed leukocyte culture. Reexamining the nature of the responding unit.

Authors:  M B Widmer; P M Sondel; F H Bach
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1972-08-01       Impact factor: 14.307

Review 9.  Programmable and multi-targeted CARs: a new breakthrough in cancer CAR-T cell therapy.

Authors:  S Tahmasebi; R Elahi; E Khosh; A Esmaeilzadeh
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 3.405

10.  Role of H-2 lymphocyte-defined and serologically-defined components in the generation of cytotoxic lymphocytes.

Authors:  B J Alter; F H Bach
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1974-11-01       Impact factor: 14.307

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.