Literature DB >> 50167

Molecular basis of chromosome banding. I. The effect of mouse DNA fractions on two fluorescent dyes in vitro.

K Simola, R K Selander, A de la Chapelle, G Corneo, E Ginelli.   

Abstract

The effects of mouse satellite, main band and total DNA on the fluorescence intensity of quinacrine and of the bibenzimidazole derivative Hoechst 33258 were tested in solution. No significant differences were noticed between the double-stranded DNAs in spite of the 5% difference in AT-content between satellite and main band DNA. Single-stranded DNAs enhanced the fluorescence intensity of Hoechst 33258 far less than double-stranded DNAs. Having been denaturated and then reassociated the DNA fractions were intermediate in their enhancing effects on the fluorescence intensity of Hoechst 33258, the differences presumably being due to different degrees of reassociation. The effect of denatured and subsequently reassociated satellite DNA on the fluorescence intensity of quinacrine was similar to that of the native DNAs. Main band and total DNA quenched the fluorescence intensity of quinacrine more after denaturation-reassociation than it did when native. In the discussion the results are related to known cytological data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1975        PMID: 50167     DOI: 10.1007/bf00284814

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chromosoma        ISSN: 0009-5915            Impact factor:   4.316


  26 in total

1.  The fluorescence of quinacrine mustard with nucleic acids.

Authors:  R K Selander; A De la Chapelle
Journal:  Nat New Biol       Date:  1973-10-24

2.  Fluorescence banding pattern of human and mouse chromosomes with a benzimidazol derivative (Hoechst 33258).

Authors:  T Raposa; A T Natarajan
Journal:  Humangenetik       Date:  1974

3.  The use of antinucleoside antibodies to probe the organization of chromosomes denatured by ultraviolet irradiation.

Authors:  R R Schreck; B F Erlanger; O J Miller
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  1974-09       Impact factor: 3.905

4.  Quinacrine fluorescence staining of chromosomes and its relationship to DNA base composition.

Authors:  C J Bostock; S Christie
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  1974-05       Impact factor: 3.905

5.  Why centric regions of guinacrine-tested mouse chromosomes show diminished fluorescence.

Authors:  B Weisblum
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1973-11-16       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  In situ localization and characterization of different classes of chromosomal DNA: acridine orange and quinacrine mustard fluorescence.

Authors:  A de la Chapelle; J Schröder; R K Selander
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1973       Impact factor: 4.316

7.  The chromosomal location of human satellite DNA 3.

Authors:  K W Jones; J Prosser; G Corneo; E Ginelli
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1973-07-18       Impact factor: 4.316

8.  Isolation and characterization of mouse and guinea pig satellite deoxyribonucleic acids.

Authors:  G Corneo; E Ginelli; C Soave; G Bernardi
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1968-12       Impact factor: 3.162

9.  Chromosomal and nuclear location of mouse satellite DNA in individual cells.

Authors:  K W Jones
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1970-03-07       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Repetitious DNA in mammalian chromosomes.

Authors:  A de la Chapelle; J Schröder; R K Selander
Journal:  Hereditas       Date:  1971       Impact factor: 3.271

View more
  7 in total

1.  Mechanisms of quinacrine binding and fluorescence in nuclei and chromosomes.

Authors:  A T Sumner
Journal:  Histochemistry       Date:  1986

2.  Interaction of anthracyclines with DNA and chromosomes.

Authors:  F P Johnston; K F Jorgenson; C C Lin; J H van de Sande
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1978-08-28       Impact factor: 4.316

3.  Characterization of Drosophila heterochromatin. II. C- and N-banding.

Authors:  S Pimpinelli; G Santini; M Gatti
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1976-09-24       Impact factor: 4.316

4.  Characterization of Drosophila heterochromatin. I. Staining and decondensation with Hoechst 33258 and quinacrine.

Authors:  M Gatti; S Pimpinelli; G Santini
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1976-09-24       Impact factor: 4.316

5.  Mechanisms of chromosome banding. IX. Are variations in DNA base composition adequate to account for quinacrine, Hoechst 33258 and daunomycin banding?

Authors:  D E Comings; M E Drets
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1976-07-08       Impact factor: 4.316

6.  Hoechst 33258 banding of Drosophila nasutoides metaphase chromosomes.

Authors:  L L Wheeler; L C Altenburg
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1977-07-18       Impact factor: 4.316

7.  Reverse fluorescent chromosome banding with chromomycin and DAPI.

Authors:  D Schweizer
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1976-11-29       Impact factor: 4.316

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.