Literature DB >> 61106

Mechanisms of chromosome banding. IX. Are variations in DNA base composition adequate to account for quinacrine, Hoechst 33258 and daunomycin banding?

D E Comings, M E Drets.   

Abstract

Prior studies on subfractions of mouse and Kangaroo rat DNA have suggested that variations in base concentration within a given genome may not be great enough to account for Q-banding. To examine this with another species, calf DNA was subfractionated by CsCl ultracentrifugation into GC-rich satellites and the main band DNA was further fractionated into AT-rich, intermediate and GC-rich portions. The effect of varying concentrations of these DNAs on quinacrine and Hoechst 33258 fluorescence was examined. Although with both compounds there was less fluorescence in the presence of the GC-rich satellites than main band fractions, these results per se did not answer the question of whether the variation in base composition alone was adequate to account for chromosome banding. To answer this the fluorescence observed in the presence of DNA of a given base composition was related to the fluorescence observed in the presence of DNA of 40% GC content (F/F40). This allowed the derivation of a term B which indicated the relative change in fluorescence per 1% change in base composition of DNA. To determine the percent change in fluorescence observed in Q-banding, the photoelectric recordings of Caspersson et al. (1971) were used. From these data we conclude: 1. Quinacrine is twice as sensitive to changes in base composition as Hoechst 33258. 2. Variation in the base content of DNA along the base content of DNA along the chromosome is sufficient to account for most Q-banding, except possibly for some of the extremes of quinacrine fluorescence. This was further examined with daunomycin. Even though daunomycin gives good fluorescent banding, DNAs varying in base composition from 100 to 40% GC content all resulted in the same relative fluorescence of 0.03. However, in the presence of poly (dA-dT) the relative fluorescence was 0.85, indicating a great sensitivity to very AT-rich DNA. This suggests that with daunomycin and possibly other fluorochromes, stretches of very AT-rich DNA may be more important in fluorescent banding than simple variation in mean base composition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1976        PMID: 61106     DOI: 10.1007/bf00293185

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chromosoma        ISSN: 0009-5915            Impact factor:   4.316


  36 in total

1.  The fluorescence of quinacrine mustard with nucleic acids.

Authors:  R K Selander; A De la Chapelle
Journal:  Nat New Biol       Date:  1973-10-24

2.  Quinacrine fluorescence staining of chromosomes and its relationship to DNA base composition.

Authors:  C J Bostock; S Christie
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  1974-05       Impact factor: 3.905

3.  Why centric regions of guinacrine-tested mouse chromosomes show diminished fluorescence.

Authors:  B Weisblum
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1973-11-16       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Nucleotide clusters in deoxyribonucleic acids. Pyrimidine oligonucleotides of mouse L-cell satellite deoxyribonucleic acid and main-band deoxyribonucleic acid.

Authors:  K Harbers; J H Spencer
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1974-03-12       Impact factor: 3.162

5.  Satellite DNA in calf heterochromatin.

Authors:  W G Yasmineh; J J Yunis
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  1971-01       Impact factor: 3.905

6.  Repeated sequences in human DNA.

Authors:  G Corneo; E Ginelli; E Polli
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1970-03-14       Impact factor: 5.469

7.  DNA-binding fluorochromes for the study of the organization of the metaphase nucleus.

Authors:  T Caspersson; L Zech; E J Modest; G E Foley; U Wagh; E Simonsson
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  1969-11       Impact factor: 3.905

8.  Deoxyribonucleic acid replication in synchronized cultured mammalian cells. I. Time of synthesis of molecules of different average uanine + cytosine content.

Authors:  A M Tobia; C L Schildkraut; J J Maio
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1970-12-28       Impact factor: 5.469

9.  Buoyant density of DNA synthesized at different stages of S phase in Chinese hamster cells.

Authors:  C J Bostock; D M Prescott
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  1971-02       Impact factor: 3.905

10.  Bovine chromosomes identified by quinacrine mustard and fluorescence microscopy.

Authors:  K M Hansen
Journal:  Hereditas       Date:  1972       Impact factor: 3.271

View more
  18 in total

Review 1.  Energy transfer and binding competition between dyes used to enhance staining differentiation in metaphase chromosomes.

Authors:  E Sahar; S A Latt
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 4.316

2.  Measurement and purification of human chromosomes by flow cytometry and sorting.

Authors:  A V Carrano; J W Gray; R G Langlois; K J Burkhart-Schultz; M A Van Dilla
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Asymmetric localization of Drosophila pair-rule transcripts from displaced nuclei: evidence for directional nuclear export.

Authors:  H Francis-Lang; I Davis; D Ish-Horowicz
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1996-02-01       Impact factor: 11.598

Review 4.  Structural characteristics of genome organization in amphibians: differential staining of chromosomes and DNA structure.

Authors:  V J Birstein
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 2.395

5.  Cytochemical studies of metaphase chromosomes by flow cytometry.

Authors:  R G Langlois; A V Carrano; J W Gray; M A Van Dilla
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 4.316

Review 6.  Counterstain-enhanced chromosome banding.

Authors:  D Schweizer
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 7.  Doxorubicin, DNA torsion, and chromatin dynamics.

Authors:  Fan Yang; Sheila S Teves; Christopher J Kemp; Steven Henikoff
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2013-12-19

8.  Localization of Drosophila nasutoides satellite DNAs in metaphase chromosomes.

Authors:  L L Wheeler; F Arrighi; M Cordeiro-Stone; C S Lee
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1978-12-21       Impact factor: 4.316

9.  Interaction of anthracyclines with DNA and chromosomes.

Authors:  F P Johnston; K F Jorgenson; C C Lin; J H van de Sande
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1978-08-28       Impact factor: 4.316

10.  Enhancement of banding patterns in human metaphase chromosomes by energy transfer.

Authors:  E Sahar; S A Latt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.