Literature DB >> 499585

Open-ended vasectomy, sperm granuloma, and postvasectomy orchialgia.

E I Shapiro, S J Silber.   

Abstract

The presence of a sperm granuloma at the vasectomy site prevents epididymal pressure build-up, perforation, and the formation of an epididymal sperm granuloma. It thus enhances reversibility of the vasectomy and lessens the likelihood of epididymal discomfort. In two prospective vasectomy series, a sperm granuloma was intentionally allowed to form by not sealing the testicular end of the vas. The sperm granuloma resulted in no instance of orchialgia, but created a greater risk of spontaneous recanalization. This latter problem could only be solved by more careful sealing of the upper end of the vas. In a separate series of nine patients vasectomized elsewhere and specifically referred to us for chronic and persistent postvasectomy orchialgia, seven had no sperm granuloma at the vasectomy site. Pain in these cases was localized in the epididymis and was relieved by vasovasotomy. Any technique of vasectomy carries a very small risk of orchialgia, whether due to the presence of a sperm granuloma at the vasectomy site or to increased epididymal pressure.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biology; Contraception; Contraception Failure; Contraceptive Usage; Diseases; Electrocoagulation; Epididymis; Family Planning; Genital Effects, Male; Genitalia; Genitalia, Male; Granulomas; Male Sterilization; Male Urologic Surgery; Pain; Physiology; Signs And Symptoms; Sterilization, Sexual; Surgery; Testis; Treatment; Urogenital System; Vas Ligation; Vas Reanastomosis; Vasectomy

Mesh:

Year:  1979        PMID: 499585     DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)44357-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  19 in total

1.  Evaluation and Management of Chronic Scrotal Content Pain-A Common Yet Poorly Understood Condition.

Authors:  Matthew J Ziegelmann; M Ryan Farrell; Laurence A Levine
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2019

Review 2.  Evaluation and management of chronic scrotal content pain.

Authors:  Laurence A Levine; Michael P Hoeh
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 3.  Is vasectomy harmful to health?

Authors:  S W McDonald
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 4.  Chronic Scrotal Content Pain: a Review of the Literature and Management Schemes.

Authors:  Paul J Oh; Petar Bajic; Scott D Lundy; Matthew Ziegelmann; Laurence A Levine
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 3.092

5.  Long-term reproductive consequences of no-scalpel vasectomy in beagles.

Authors:  Yuanfeng Zhang; Xinggang Wang; Zonglin Chen; Xunbin Huang
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2012-12-28

6.  A comparison of epididymectomy with vasectomy reversal for the surgical treatment of postvasectomy pain syndrome.

Authors:  Joo Yong Lee; Kang Su Cho; Seung Hwan Lee; Hee Ju Cho; Jeong Man Cho; Cheol Young Oh; June Hyun Han; Ki Soo Lee; Tae Hyo Kim; Seung Wook Lee
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2013-09-21       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 7.  [Chronic pain in urology: inguinal pain, post vasectomy pain, and chronic pelvic pain].

Authors:  Enver Ozgür; Oguzhan Dagtekin
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2009

8.  Referred scrotal pain: case reports and review.

Authors:  S R McGee
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Pain on ejaculation after vasectomy.

Authors:  I S Edwards; B Errey
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1982-06-05

Review 10.  Current status of vasectomy reversal.

Authors:  J Ullrich Schwarzer; Heiko Steinfatt
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2013-02-12       Impact factor: 14.432

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.